Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:57:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:56:54 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:44296 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:56:45 -0500 Subject: Re: What is standing in the way of opening the 2.5 tree? To: jack@suse.cz (Jan Kara) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 23:03:43 +0000 (GMT) Cc: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller), jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, miles@megapathdsl.net, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011030192902.B22781@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> from "Jan Kara" at Oct 30, 2001 07:29:02 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The second patch is patch which implements new quota format. It makes > changes in quotactl() interface and other changes visible in userspace. > I think that is the reason why Linus doesn't want it in 2.4 and I agree with him. The problem is that without it 32bit uids are useless. That means any real world ldap using customer can't use Linus quotas. I'd really like to figure a way the code can handle both at once - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/