Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] atomisp: Fixes and cleanups
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200921215359.45003-1-alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
 <20200922101143.28779711@coco.lan>
From:   Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <21f18dc2-a1bc-0a37-0336-fc35170a40e9@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:16:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200922101143.28779711@coco.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

On 22/09/2020 09:11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:53:49 +0100
> Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Mauro,
>>
>> Over the last month I've sent a few scattered patches to fix various
>> warnings from static analysers, but they seem to have fallen through the
>> cracks? I'm reposting them here as a series to make them easier to
>> review. If you do have any feedback that'd be great :)
> Usually, there's no need to re-send the patches, as we pick them
> from a patchwork queue.
>
> However, only one of the patches actually applied against the
> linux-media tree.
>
> So, please rebased the remaining patches on the top of it.
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
That's weird. They applied cleanly against yesterday's linux-next for 
me... I'll rebase on linux-media and resend.

Best,
Alex