Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:11:43 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
To:     Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
Cc:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] atomisp: Fixes and cleanups
Message-ID: <20200922101143.28779711@coco.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20200921215359.45003-1-alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
References: <20200921215359.45003-1-alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Em Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:53:49 +0100
Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi Mauro,
> 
> Over the last month I've sent a few scattered patches to fix various
> warnings from static analysers, but they seem to have fallen through the
> cracks? I'm reposting them here as a series to make them easier to
> review. If you do have any feedback that'd be great :)

Usually, there's no need to re-send the patches, as we pick them
from a patchwork queue.

However, only one of the patches actually applied against the
linux-media tree.

So, please rebased the remaining patches on the top of it.

Thanks,
Mauro