Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp3836778pxk; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:04:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYWjFeZzbQe1Hz92ulodhO+oK32aROpK9aHvLx9sv8nygId1I8E0+B+9e0p2dLI6EX8Dn7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:594c:: with SMTP id g12mr4333360ejr.347.1600772646726; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:04:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600772646; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PvGHhlleAT9pZEzB3n3N7ZeUXPqV49sDtsBBw1FUlkXzHghtEltVyfzJDMolesuScM uiVQPHiAMwKijU0LMBj0tP0yTT1q04j3sgd2DmCp9MQGj3fz3wJg9KJPT/2b+Afs3jvi KPvPHxzO7w5psxBX33lfiU4HcQJRXXd/s44TpNIQfunLLzQ/47AKdKs4L6Ws992AMpZN hAnYmMp7WH79fGUVRqkdTExpylFG/FcuIp5teL5KHIdsOE3M6AcmRYcopaAQCIl5RYZf dpelOvWp65PUK6mdhMOWI0WEEwKVST5j90jrhiBLK08wGujV+SpFR/292vWG/AA/sFkk 5doA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=QP7D4zsS7srJZeKE4h7PMo3PEFbsrs5XuKLoWtHlLfQ=; b=ya2+hkwE3Z6cF1Fljqkfr2MYQ5UGgzOdiklBvTxHqbARnBaZPma3gErRhPgVxVqGjW goXw/fRh9IKJoT7lzmhHE98cSvDJ2VD28L6tVJoG6vYYG0HyShpHPcAFyzJVIq2WWmLP nqXYidibuW86oSuSUbu70pVyidm33PEN+RD+BWkXOPSTsurs/0NkvbBx6hEXtEgRCuPs U0JaAbD3hRv6Dw03f3KxXtQEluGjKK+uH58MlqyYuAULP3IfCIDrQMHIlUDOt3RMWECJ VEoJrqlsWjS9YAwlGs5di4qU52GxXsBYkZzgZTiSPkOGcJbqsGEbCF3KFujIZIB5OW65 oNxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Umn46go7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m26si10419258ejc.349.2020.09.22.04.03.42; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Umn46go7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726554AbgIVLCj (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:02:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34134 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726340AbgIVLCj (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:02:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com (mail-wm1-x341.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4D08C061755; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id z9so2894370wmk.1; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:02:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=QP7D4zsS7srJZeKE4h7PMo3PEFbsrs5XuKLoWtHlLfQ=; b=Umn46go7btEmLeJcyiwsP02dYQUWvorQNa1lYDjJe5hLI8gBjUXG99anKJIZ8KW1oO aWnS2IwBNxRgDc4BdFsb/2bzZxWIaDPdYHe+YEhjSVZdBOCpqyxoVj5BQSwbKIHZ/0E+ Fg/bG5+dMDlnqMiui80vfu6VAYwn8rlfvTnmganxFWap07IU5RqfIrTYneIe0ybsaJib TJ/gUnPvxeHP7oFVD5NhWxX0YZI8arEDT5jCtmKbw0sUUkSF7E73qgspyakaSXtNQvRk KUSCd/VJelPux235gIzr9NJbR5LMuf7fWrTqH9IE0cZH1BY6e/hal929kqGCd89sRJRo Htjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=QP7D4zsS7srJZeKE4h7PMo3PEFbsrs5XuKLoWtHlLfQ=; b=QgcUHWpGfvqeaJj4ihcVLhZYUxPaM/FOJ0aFtFcE9kMi03fVxZV1paG/FImrMfnkPF J1BpttkGIBdL4GyCsG9n0HMNqAJQFLKjOF7SQoy9WiBWceOyUYQ75BXsfLd+siTiWyCv drj0F+kr/qUwR7t/N/xqrwKyTuGDmoAEMfltiYb9SJrn0s+g95gIkx6xZatuYo+6zEtU vzHTq+wTT2ao01eucNK2PQ0zOQdJ5yz865sHPCJuFJOqYoQk6kNakPmArvAE++5CQ6bt /wyXkBwHL1ENrOa9cTR1X8Ehe5c9Ehb3qNthh6G764WO9bG8ZnGLQzrojMrGArRRk6b4 172w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+XMuV+mYmxZ86hjpDdX223A2WSJxTvIs/vkue7z+X40znlNmI rNekBvvJM2Jy3JHdHAipgOKfvBVQvRRQUpKg X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b388:: with SMTP id c130mr356538wmf.175.1600772557222; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.64] (cpc83661-brig20-2-0-cust443.3-3.cable.virginm.net. [82.28.105.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a83sm4085301wmh.48.2020.09.22.04.02.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASE 0/3] atomisp: Rebased fixes To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dan Carpenter , Alan Cox , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <21f18dc2-a1bc-0a37-0336-fc35170a40e9@gmail.com> <20200922090914.20702-1-alex.dewar90@gmail.com> <20200922112729.313d454d@coco.lan> From: Alex Dewar Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200922112729.313d454d@coco.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/09/2020 10:27, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:09:07 +0100 > Alex Dewar escreveu: > >> Hi Mauro, >> >> I've rebased the patches now, but there is a slight hiccup. For patches 2 >> and 3 of this series there will now be a conflict with commit 9289cdf39992 >> ("staging: media: atomisp: Convert to GPIO descriptors") in Greg's tree. >> >> I'm not sure what the best way to handle this is? The merge conflicts >> will be trivial (due to a conversion between the gpio_* and gpiod_* >> APIs), but I could alternatively send these last two patches in via >> Greg's tree if that's easier for people. Let me know what works. > Maybe the best would be to re-send those after the merge window, when > both patches will arrive upstream. > > Thanks, > Mauro That sounds more sensible. I've also just noticed that I introduced a bug in the first patch when rebasing it :-/, so let's hold off on the whole series and I'll do a proper tidy and resend after the next merge window. Best, Alex