Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>
To:     =?UTF-8?q?Roger=20Pau=20Monn=C3=A9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
CC:     =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=BCrgen=20Gro=C3=9F?= <jgross@suse.com>,
        SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        <aliguori@amazon.com>, <amit@kernel.org>, <mheyne@amazon.de>,
        <pdurrant@amazon.co.uk>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] xen-blkfront: Apply changed parameter name to the document
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:02:55 +0200
Message-ID: <20200922150255.5850-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200922144425.GL19254@Air-de-Roger>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:44:25 +0200 "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 04:27:39PM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> > On 22.09.20 16:15, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
> > > 
> > > Commit 14e710fe7897 ("xen-blkfront: rename indirect descriptor
> > > parameter") changed the name of the module parameter for the maximum
> > > amount of segments in indirect requests but missed updating the
> > > document.  This commit updates the document.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> 
> Does this need to be backported to stable branches?

I don't think so, as this is not a bug affecting users?


Thanks,
SeongJae Park