Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp4063356pxk; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+iNv6ouK5RGn64G3JTaMl9g8UEngtmENcp7I7YBhhk2leE42Cj1ut3NJilmZtLpVwHBj0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:696:: with SMTP id f22mr4683238edy.290.1600791784479; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600791784; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zQCErSbrOxQBUCZ7c2mZsH3kA9cvoRogDnW+tPRkCs6/DlFgM9YKePaAqGHcjA64Z6 a7b22eN7UPemLtEG8nZpOtL4GKoy5eNjVSzo7kICdwRcK1tx+tElhGRO/KEL6cHGHmtZ 7B7qu4R1gl7NOmk0LF4ln35Nync8F2/OrIxKhIC/kqVHq6RaJ8Z+L5btkUZ8yWWLy1Lg 1HUYmOu0cl9kTvbxgQFpMDKyhi8OpdazB0JgTQBTKof8XBcM5aGKw0tZa1Iy2BZBg7Qq x3TLNIb2whPRFS2W1p4QmVkzfHwrPhsXmhTv6W5kjRPIibmmscOXSf3prUoUeOqLtRp0 qaUQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Eqz9uNN066TLkfSzrAhCT5xSB1Mmc46s8maphbcV1AU=; b=UYdbPwbVPAk/HvHTCdO1fZ76yn0Xk2AhII6GqTLheMwdX57s7UJITcJCL5T8EV0I1x 1xau6Unyos7M2p6C3LVbX4K3nW8Y5ZmZclSli3fD68HKAt6aSR4H8TznGBxOqCWWWXwq dxH7JjtBN85dpUCB2ofzdYHKYRaDB5wjFT4y0MGdXkd9vQooxzeQYlmRga9jVxUo7QFp UhWRT3mga/tqTowgPIjoDb60CK9hNRwaKkDpbfe/skCRMv5+7FUd5xZoq+5KInC6mQOr QaOboFtfGsmxPbD6xLxjRS51r/TBwdK65yC6hDjPPftNOU0Lh+nnA1K4Aw0N8BGIDUlN kF7Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="SD/Fq8G0"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d19si10777222edp.595.2020.09.22.09.22.39; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="SD/Fq8G0"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726655AbgIVQVd (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:21:33 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50472 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726631AbgIVQVc (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:21:32 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39B122086A; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:21:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600791692; bh=pCDMKkJqYt2tgKBzY7siELuMz/N2bEJBG7ZD5DoMia4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SD/Fq8G01kIWmssW/Tx1ZkLlppmVPXOOe8LspTTe6Bqx5dabfY1Sip3sLdq4eCAbB UXp7P7S16ejf2T/iX0qDiL9amWOlx7njX/jv8VQfw8vvpEwCSAOKoygt0GNj7fCAhF N7sNRc1UlWirpo+M0DSgOT4pr7wEGSthGjztlNng= Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:21:52 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Torsten Duwe Cc: Stephan Mueller , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Nicolai Stange , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Arnd Bergmann , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Alexander E. Patrakov" , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Willy Tarreau , Matthew Garrett , Vito Caputo , Andreas Dilger , Jan Kara , Ray Strode , William Jon McCann , zhangjs , Andy Lutomirski , Florian Weimer , Lennart Poettering , Peter Matthias , Marcelo Henrique Cerri , Roman Drahtmueller , Neil Horman , Randy Dunlap , Julia Lawall , Dan Carpenter , Andy Lavr , Eric Biggers , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Petr Tesarik Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION PATCH 00/41] random: possible ways towards NIST SP800-90B compliance Message-ID: <20200922162152.GB2299429@kroah.com> References: <20200921075857.4424-1-nstange@suse.de> <8618155.4vTCxPXJkl@tauon.chronox.de> <20200922132344.GA2728@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200922132344.GA2728@lst.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:40:37AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > > Am Montag, 21. September 2020, 09:58:16 CEST schrieb Nicolai Stange: > > > > > - people dislike the approach of having two competing implementations for > > > what is basically the same functionality in the kernel. > > > > Is this really so bad considering the security implications on this topic? We > > also have multiple file systems, multiple memory allocators, etc... > > Exactly. I thought Linux was about the freedom of choice. http://www.islinuxaboutchoice.com/ :)