Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20200904030958.13325-4-jonathan@marek.ca>
References: <20200904030958.13325-1-jonathan@marek.ca> <20200904030958.13325-4-jonathan@marek.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: add SM8250 QCOM video clock bindings
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To:     Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:49:42 -0700
Message-ID: <160080058276.310579.5580925712920687353@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
User-Agent: alot/0.9.1
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-09-03 20:09:52)
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml b/=
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml
> index d04f5bd28dde..66a6066ae353 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml
> @@ -24,14 +25,19 @@ properties:
>        - qcom,sdm845-videocc
>        - qcom,sc7180-videocc
>        - qcom,sm8150-videocc
> +      - qcom,sm8250-videocc
> =20
>    clocks:
> +    minItems: 1
>      items:
>        - description: Board XO source
> +      - description: Board XO source, always-on (required by sm8250 only)

I'd expect every SoC to need it. Can you leave it out for now and we can
add it when it becomes required?