Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20200911153412.21672-7-jonathan@marek.ca>
References: <20200911153412.21672-1-jonathan@marek.ca> <20200911153412.21672-7-jonathan@marek.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] clk: qcom: Add display clock controller driver for SM8150
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
To:     Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:04:55 -0700
Message-ID: <160080149549.310579.17453759593211612997@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
User-Agent: alot/0.9.1
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-09-11 08:34:06)
> Add support for the display clock controller found on SM8150
> based devices. This would allow display drivers to probe and
> control their clocks.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig         |    9 +
>  drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile        |    1 +
>  drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8150.c | 1152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 1162 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8150.c

If the bindings are the same for these two drivers I wonder if there is
anything different between the two. Maybe the two drivers can be one
driver?