Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:33:27 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Cc:     vkoul@kernel.org, tudor.ambarus@microchip.com,
        ludovic.desroches@microchip.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] dt-bindings: dmaengine: at_xdmac: add optional
 microchip,m2m property
Message-ID: <20200922233327.GA3474555@bogus>
References: <20200914140956.221432-1-eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
 <20200914140956.221432-7-eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200914140956.221432-7-eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 05:09:55PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> Add optional microchip,m2m property that specifies if a controller is
> dedicated to memory to memory operations only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/atmel-xdma.txt | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/atmel-xdma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/atmel-xdma.txt
> index 510b7f25ba24..642da6b95a29 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/atmel-xdma.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/atmel-xdma.txt
> @@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ the dmas property of client devices.
>      interface identifier,
>      - bit 30-24: PERID, peripheral identifier.
>  
> +Optional properties:
> +- microchip,m2m: this controller is connected on AXI only to memory and it's
> +	dedicated to memory to memory DMA operations. If this option is
> +	missing, it's assumed that the DMA controller is connected to
> +	peripherals, thus it's a per2mem and mem2per.

Wouldn't 'dma-requests = <0>' cover this case?

Rob