Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: stm32_rproc: update for
 firmware synchronization
From:   Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
CC:     Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@st.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
References: <20200827072101.26588-1-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
 <20200827072101.26588-3-arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
 <20200909202251.GA2975092@bogus>
 <c9d45617-6de9-7e49-0c82-151e67fff61d@st.com>
Message-ID: <cb39ab93-93db-1c2e-4e95-6ec767071549@st.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:30:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c9d45617-6de9-7e49-0c82-151e67fff61d@st.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rob,

Gentle reminder.
As I'm not sure to well understand your comment I would appreciate if you could
confirm your expectation before I sent a v2.

Thanks in advance,
Arnaud 

On 9/11/20 3:49 PM, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On 9/9/20 10:22 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:21:00AM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>>> Add new properties description used to attach to a pre-loaded
>>> firmware according to the commit 9276536f455b3
>>> ("remoteproc: stm32: Parse syscon that will manage M4 synchronisation")
>>> which updates the driver part.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml   | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml
>>> index 4ffa25268fcc..e50957d86b1c 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml
>>> @@ -96,6 +96,25 @@ properties:
>>>          3rd cell: register bitmask for the deep sleep bit
>>>      maxItems: 1
>>>  
>>> +  st,syscfg-m4-state:
>>> +    $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array"
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Reference to the tamp register which exposes the Cortex-M4 state.
>>> +        1st cell: phandle to syscon block
>>> +        2nd cell: register offset containing the Cortex-M4 state
>>> +        3rd cell: register bitmask for the Cortex-M4 state
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  st,syscfg-rsc-tbl:
>>> +    $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array"
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Reference to the tamp register which references the Cortex-M4
>>> +      resource table address.
>>> +        1st cell: phandle to syscon block
>>> +        2nd cell: register offset containing the resource table address
>>> +        3rd cell: register bitmask for the resource table address
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>
>> Why can't these be implied? You can lookup the tamp syscon by 
>> compatible.
> 
> I just made a copy/past of the  "st,syscfg-pdds" syscon description available in the same file [1]
>   
> I can provide a shorter descriptions, something like this:
> 
>    description: |
>      Reference to the tamp syscon register and bitmask which contains the Cortex-M4
>       resource table address.
>    maxItems: 1
> 
> Would this meet your expectations? If yes, I will also add in next version an extra patch to fix [1]
> 
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.9-rc3/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml#L90
> 
>>
>> Please add these to the example.
> 
> I will extend the example with these properties
> 
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
> 
>>
>>> +
>>>    st,auto-boot:
>>>      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>>>      description:
>>> -- 
>>> 2.17.1
>>>