Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp459881pxk; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:34:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZAbKCcemxmFT7jrTZi1J24VTCTxqZsLp4duQQqb/n+3wZOitiGA7VxDQLYYV5nXa7r8dv X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:202a:: with SMTP id ay10mr10273082edb.36.1600871667669; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:34:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600871667; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NKwO3X8OSVDyydKmh+ipmMIdQ5N5UdTyKBn406+ABNsj4cGeFMRS3vulHZuqJvAlQE SixpL7ncw32uxML3v7gDcTcIYMl95VQfJhiGWCXxGpu+dBwYii6oK3ROiYCA1s9mgHaw kl8bu0ElOV6zGqYElAvh7C0G02/Wh9XfViHYqSlnf8E2tQuqCHbWE2yKhmj81+rMYdNd YRQyChv+Xg1kgF84BI/dewk8jLiVngZRscJkvfyGITvv/AFbagmCvB1Vd7vSWG2/uZYq c0ln0e6jgcUZvTOip0Z8SdHTeowlN2ZCoZof3tC4LrgLcCUckQ8U4ylIdCrD6R/+adDv a51w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=N1OwBNTX/+tbcCgfuRAd6HUUJ0yHAo8TOH6HN7Ge8xI=; b=fP8cBu/8wfP7ykFUYs3r1BFap/hJ18iiqReXE3jr/vZk1Z56l2fTjB5CXVT4NdVJB6 BhO3Lg3lumSmQbPJib5do4FKPAFPlY5xuGugpizbWupZivgQqkdWRbWsWPUQLjrZbu5S 4yzNJEYgrrcgL9PandfG1oPoWGxPSLRh9oyyKPqtxxInphAIrGzfPk7RxTIcQpptDYV6 dM2vGAZqceC0+rjDcuaTY0JJLd7T1Qe+xjIuRCexFBhPuBVqolPLwy0ocegpVbIFkFLW /gmYGYrdlzn45D7s2mvdwLuT3pqBz62rbCFfSEKWJiKFHcv5uFeUBzWjlXjNsTDjf3b8 X8vQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cb11si12961760edb.361.2020.09.23.07.34.01; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726762AbgIWOc5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:32:57 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48690 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726587AbgIWOc4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:32:56 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 0E0AE6736F; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:32:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:32:51 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Al Viro Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , Arnd Bergmann , David Howells , David Laight , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] fs: remove various compat readv/writev helpers Message-ID: <20200923143251.GA14062@lst.de> References: <20200923060547.16903-1-hch@lst.de> <20200923060547.16903-6-hch@lst.de> <20200923142549.GK3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200923142549.GK3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:25:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:05:43AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(readv, compat_ulong_t, fd, > > - const struct compat_iovec __user *,vec, > > + const struct iovec __user *, vec, > > Um... Will it even compile? > > > #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_PREADV64 > > COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE4(preadv64, unsigned long, fd, > > - const struct compat_iovec __user *,vec, > > + const struct iovec __user *, vec, > > Ditto. Look into include/linux/compat.h and you'll see > > asmlinkage long compat_sys_preadv64(unsigned long fd, > const struct compat_iovec __user *vec, > unsigned long vlen, loff_t pos); > > How does that manage to avoid the compiler screaming bloody > murder? That's a very good question. But it does not just compile but actually works. Probably because all the syscall wrappers mean that we don't actually generate the normal names. I just tried this: --- a/include/linux/syscalls.h +++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_lseek(unsigned int fd, off_t offset, asmlinkage long sys_read(unsigned int fd, char __user *buf, size_t count); asmlinkage long sys_write(unsigned int fd, const char __user *buf, size_t count); -asmlinkage long sys_readv(unsigned long fd, +asmlinkage long sys_readv(void *fd, for fun, and the compiler doesn't care either..