Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200922023151.387447-1-warthog618@gmail.com> <20200922023151.387447-11-warthog618@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VdaPR+iihenPYos1mAGLbDhJPvCfDTtURpk_MBa=3wYEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdaPR+iihenPYos1mAGLbDhJPvCfDTtURpk_MBa=3wYEg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:15:46 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcktxp1C6NTOrW-WEnfueOu0UvtquFLpsL5+vv6Fdaajw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/20] gpiolib: cdev: support GPIO_V2_LINE_SET_CONFIG_IOCTL
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 7:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:35 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add support for GPIO_V2_LINE_SET_CONFIG_IOCTL, the uAPI v2
> > line set config ioctl.

> > +static long linereq_set_config_unlocked(struct linereq *lr,
> > +                                       struct gpio_v2_line_config *lc)
> > +{
> > +       struct gpio_desc *desc;
> > +       unsigned int i;
> > +       u64 flags;
> > +       bool polarity_change;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < lr->num_lines; i++) {
> > +               desc = lr->lines[i].desc;
> > +               flags = gpio_v2_line_config_flags(lc, i);
>
> > +               polarity_change =
> > +                       (test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags) !=
> > +                        ((flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW) != 0));
>
> Comparison

Comparison between int / long (not all archs are agreed on this) and
boolean is not the best we can do.

What about

  bool old_polarity = test_bit(FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, &desc->flags);
  bool new_polarity = flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW;

  old_polarity ^ new_polarity

and move this under INPUT conditional?

> > +
> > +               gpio_v2_line_config_flags_to_desc_flags(flags, &desc->flags);
> > +               /*
> > +                * Lines have to be requested explicitly for input
> > +                * or output, else the line will be treated "as is".
> > +                */
> > +               if (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OUTPUT) {
> > +                       int val = gpio_v2_line_config_output_value(lc, i);
> > +
> > +                       edge_detector_stop(&lr->lines[i]);
> > +                       ret = gpiod_direction_output(desc, val);
> > +                       if (ret)
> > +                               return ret;
> > +               } else if (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_INPUT) {
> > +                       ret = gpiod_direction_input(desc);
> > +                       if (ret)
> > +                               return ret;
> > +
> > +                       ret = edge_detector_update(&lr->lines[i],
> > +                                       flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_EDGE_FLAGS,
> > +                                       polarity_change);
> > +                       if (ret)
> > +                               return ret;
> > +               }
> > +
> > +               blocking_notifier_call_chain(&desc->gdev->notifier,
> > +                                            GPIO_V2_LINE_CHANGED_CONFIG,
> > +                                            desc);
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko