Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH can-next 1/2] can: tcan4x5x: Rename parse_config
 function
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
To:     <mkl@pengutronix.de>, <wg@grandegger.com>
CC:     <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20200227183829.21854-1-dmurphy@ti.com>
 <057bc43f-7db5-de7e-dbf5-8bfe324a973e@ti.com>
Message-ID: <b61b1a65-90c6-5380-d4ba-d8efcdb42094@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:06:23 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <057bc43f-7db5-de7e-dbf5-8bfe324a973e@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

Mark and Wolfgang

On 4/28/20 2:48 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Marc
>
> On 2/27/20 12:38 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Rename the tcan4x5x_parse_config function to tcan4x5x_get_gpios since
>> the function retrieves the gpio configurations from the firmware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c 
>> b/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>> index 9821babef55e..37d53ecc560b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int tcan4x5x_disable_state(struct 
>> m_can_classdev *cdev)
>>                     TCAN4X5X_DISABLE_INH_MSK, 0x01);
>>   }
>>   -static int tcan4x5x_parse_config(struct m_can_classdev *cdev)
>> +static int tcan4x5x_get_gpios(struct m_can_classdev *cdev)
>>   {
>>       struct tcan4x5x_priv *tcan4x5x = cdev->device_data;
>>       int ret;
>> @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static int tcan4x5x_can_probe(struct spi_device 
>> *spi)
>>       if (ret)
>>           return ret;
>>   -    ret = tcan4x5x_parse_config(mcan_class);
>> +    ret = tcan4x5x_get_gpios(mcan_class);
>>       if (ret)
>>           goto out_power;
>
> I noticed this series never was reviewed and applied.  They are still 
> applicable and were requested changes.
>
Did you need me to combine all the patches on a m_can-next branch and 
submit a PR after test?

There are quite a few patches out there and they all seem relevant.

Dan


> Dan
>