Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:48:38 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
        =?utf-8?B?Qmxhxb4=?= Hrastnik <blaz@mxxn.io>,
        Dorian Stoll <dorian.stoll@tmsp.io>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] misc: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem
Message-ID: <20200924064838.GB593984@kroah.com>
References: <20200923151511.3842150-1-luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
 <20200923151511.3842150-2-luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
 <20200923165745.GA3732240@kroah.com>
 <de24d687-62c2-1f34-cac2-d32246c68a09@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <de24d687-62c2-1f34-cac2-d32246c68a09@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:34:23PM +0200, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> In short: Concurrent execution of the counter functions works, as far as
> I can tell at least, and, as you see by the long answer, I have to spend
> some time and think about the duplicate-value problem (again). If you've
> managed to read through this wall of text (sorry about that) and you
> have any ideas/preferences, please let me know.

No, this all answers my question really well, thanks, what you have now
is fine, no need to change it.

thanks,

greg k-h