Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200924040513.31051-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
 <CAG_fn=W2dcGKFKHpDXzNvbPUp3USYyWi2DEpEewboqYBodnSsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANpmjNNmeqfMLZ0aFC49fHTYS5k7BqTZHP4FmDc=sfZe+j6bOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNNmeqfMLZ0aFC49fHTYS5k7BqTZHP4FmDc=sfZe+j6bOg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:11:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=UFnju7qBw2FC8nGxTKQ5VB2QeG-DKik_t=eWzu6p+H6A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] kasan: print timer and workqueue stack
To:     Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc:     Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 1:55 PM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 13:47, Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> wro=
te:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:05 AM Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com> w=
rote:
> > >
> > > The aux_stack[2] is reused to record the call_rcu() call stack,
> > > timer init call stack, and enqueuing work call stacks. So that
> > > we need to change the auxiliary stack title for common title,
> > > print them in KASAN report.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> > > Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
> > > Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
> > > Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > - Thanks for Marco suggestion.
> > > - We modify aux stack title name in KASAN report
> > >   in order to print call_rcu()/timer/workqueue stack.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >  mm/kasan/report.c | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/kasan/report.c b/mm/kasan/report.c
> > > index 4f49fa6cd1aa..886809d0a8dd 100644
> > > --- a/mm/kasan/report.c
> > > +++ b/mm/kasan/report.c
> > > @@ -183,12 +183,12 @@ static void describe_object(struct kmem_cache *=
cache, void *object,
> > >
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC
> > >                 if (alloc_info->aux_stack[0]) {
> > > -                       pr_err("Last call_rcu():\n");
> > > +                       pr_err("Last potentially related work creatio=
n:\n");
> >
> > This doesn't have to be a work creation (expect more callers of
> > kasan_record_aux_stack() in the future), so maybe change the wording
> > here to "Last potentially related auxiliary stack"?
>
> I suggested "work creation" as it's the most precise for what it is
> used for now.

I see, then maybe my suggestion is premature.

> What other users do you have in mind in future that are not work creation=
?

I think saving stacks may help in any case where an object is reused
for a different purpose without reallocation.
SKBs, maybe?


--
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Stra=C3=9Fe, 33
80636 M=C3=BCnchen

Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg