Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc:     kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] timer: kasan: record timer stack
In-Reply-To: <20200924040335.30934-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
References: <20200924040335.30934-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:41:27 +0200
Message-ID: <87h7rm97js.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 24 2020 at 12:03, Walter Wu wrote:
> When analyze use-after-free or double-free issue, recording the timer
> stacks is helpful to preserve usage history which potentially gives
> a hint about the affected code.
>
> Record the most recent two timer init calls in KASAN which are printed
> on failure in the KASAN report.
>
> For timers it has turned out to be useful to record the stack trace
> of the timer init call.

In which way? And what kind of bug does it catch which cannot be catched
by existing debug mechanisms already?

> Because if the UAF root cause is in timer init, then user can see
> KASAN report to get where it is registered and find out the root
> cause.

What? If the UAF root cause is in timer init, then registering it after
using it in that very same function is pretty pointless.

> It don't need to enable DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS, but they have a chance
> to find out the root cause.

There is a lot of handwaving how useful this is, but TBH I don't see the
value at all.

DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS does a lot more than crashing on UAF. If KASAN
provides additional value over DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS then spell it out,
but just saying that you don't need to enable DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS is
not making an argument for that change.

Try again please.

Thanks,

        tglx