Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030287AbWHDJcA (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 05:32:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030300AbWHDJcA (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 05:32:00 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]:45085 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030287AbWHDJb7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 05:31:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DW68amt8C4E1rgVShy4d30OBQGqVF4LuOBGb20uJmtxjrSZV+jBZ+5luOjBfzxqoNCXxkTUOOEsa2rsaU06nOIvUWxsSoQ0GOAjVhy9nLdOQi43j4W4Ou9YXDrM168tYRho2p+Fb39EiAjWqqC9vrhZVoYvInFhS9NVlcphm/98= Message-ID: <9a8748490608040231u4c696f57sf7cae1b708456aec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:31:58 +0200 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Patrick McHardy" Subject: Re: [patch 00/23] -stable review Cc: "Greg KH" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, "Justin Forbes" , "Zwane Mwaikambo" , "Theodore Ts'o" , "Randy Dunlap" , "Dave Jones" , "Chuck Wolber" , "Chris Wedgwood" , torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk In-Reply-To: <44D3125F.2050008@trash.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060804053807.GA769@kroah.com> <9a8748490608040204o58f7f594qe8c3316fcdf00ea4@mail.gmail.com> <44D30F04.9060300@trash.net> <9a8748490608040219q3c385440u3503bf6504f84d4a@mail.gmail.com> <44D3125F.2050008@trash.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1410 Lines: 34 On 04/08/06, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On 04/08/06, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > > >> Jesper Juhl wrote: > >> > Any chance that the fixes in the (latest) e1000 driver version > >> > 7.1.9-k4 will get backported? > >> > > >> > I get messages along the lines of "kernel: Virtual device XXX asks to > >> > queue packet!" and the device then refuses to work. > >> > The last kernel where I know for a fact that it worked OK is 2.6.11, > >> > so that's what the server is currently running. > >> > >> That message should never be seen on a device with a queue. What device > >> exactly is "XXX"? > >> > > eth0.20 > > This problem is fixed by "[patch 10/23] VLAN state handling fix". > Ahh, ok, I didn't realize that. That's great news, then there's a chance that 2.6.17.8 will work for me - I'll certainly test that and report back. I can't test on that server until monday though, so I won't be able to test it before 2.6.17.8 is out. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/