Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp946023pxk; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:58:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOiWTIqgS7dryO0eAJkrTpvwFpJTo3EakRdqm49D1yPHcmKdjFFBo28PWMJe2pUgHUj07E X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:4276:: with SMTP id nq6mr1618478ejb.246.1601024315126; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:58:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601024315; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mS8chCo1BYbfQ8ZIJD+uRpteoN1nLdxOeiOeHHKy67+7poTpanoHbcbuc0wh9W3y1T 1uyrSMuI0uy+UByODntDM3O9FyU5hGn2AJzlAjzZlHZAiCUFcpBfX3re2K8IkbEitOtA jSS0DCv8+1Myn0oynvwJyTCv4IE0XYQveGMrWC8AkyavzwvMJLrLwVn2iNqhijF01FUl 63VAZUxEuF/a+/Xx8AY+hXEAkfbKkTnddyOK+/T5lDzKJ4AsalisZmFxic91M/4ZxIxb k2C4BDI4Vs08RoGCIj1fSdjqCpuiRAISHLyDHqu64kby20kL3yyy/M9y1nB5yP0hWT+Q q6LQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :autocrypt:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=3sgv1pOZlB06dEQ0nLJCJG7WcKIpgapVe9e7yCMNbog=; b=Ts3myZeTSIGPcK/32jCB5RLJlRerM6LIe4w/ghbs7/o06xhVMxdBPGTr5P8XIIbFqS YTg1wBHqcLvJDQ6oJGNMKrjKOeSBXlrOY3AB30bd7Kj8d6ZNNzFRjQrj5g8Yomlv4Iro 7HW8pRDX3XOsbkEJ82dIAI4CHy7xbE0K/Vhda05ROfqdKEu5jL58pgP/S96OW+JbLrIv +XTTCNrMM0lSqopBN8CkSnIaQEqasdPqETGIFsumVGX/G1wEoFyvEmiwIG5p0BNPpCCc 7EPhI+ARF8ARuFhr7HXI4ZR5kx4M1fbWpB0yBbvPR0qQpe45D/uGnw1XU+v3GzFswjIC iapg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=E1t63bbe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i3si1318535edj.574.2020.09.25.01.58.11; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=E1t63bbe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727668AbgIYIzA (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 04:55:00 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:26928 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726990AbgIYIzA (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 04:55:00 -0400 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601024097; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=3sgv1pOZlB06dEQ0nLJCJG7WcKIpgapVe9e7yCMNbog=; b=E1t63bbe8dDogIM3TSMgFEDaGBkBTc7fzvtVnoXiPy5111l7PCkT2KZObdiXS0OGPLR0uF nJncz7m58JXYzFK2BDDr0Qfgbn4BSTIplKXk2ec+9qJuncTNxCBPYwLv1M+9/wosRwlJ2G Yot3He0cedo52dvNO/WYiBHmb9n/If0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-410-L5b0IUGPMD2PwNgdTNW4dA-1; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: L5b0IUGPMD2PwNgdTNW4dA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA291800E23; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.211] (ovpn-112-211.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.211]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7468578822; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/23] device-dax: Kill dax_kmem_res To: Dan Williams Cc: Joao Martins , Andrew Morton , Vishal Verma , Dave Hansen , Pavel Tatashin , Peter Zijlstra , Ard Biesheuvel , Linux MM , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ACPI , Maling list - DRI developers References: <79BEC711-C769-432B-9A50-63C6A3AEB0E3@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63W5Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAjwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:54:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24.09.20 23:50, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:42 PM David Hildenbrand wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 24.09.2020 um 23:26 schrieb Dan Williams : >>> >>> [..] >>>>> I'm not suggesting to busy the whole "virtio" range, just the portion >>>>> that's about to be passed to add_memory_driver_managed(). >>>> >>>> I'm afraid I don't get your point. For virtio-mem: >>>> >>>> Before: >>>> >>>> 1. Create virtio0 container resource >>>> >>>> 2. (somewhen in the future) add_memory_driver_managed() >>>> - Create resource (System RAM (virtio_mem)), marking it busy/driver >>>> managed >>>> >>>> After: >>>> >>>> 1. Create virtio0 container resource >>>> >>>> 2. (somewhen in the future) Create resource (System RAM (virtio_mem)), >>>> marking it busy/driver managed >>>> 3. add_memory_driver_managed() >>>> >>>> Not helpful or simpler IMHO. >>> >>> The concern I'm trying to address is the theoretical race window and >>> layering violation in this sequence in the kmem driver: >>> >>> 1/ res = request_mem_region(...); >>> 2/ res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; >>> 3/ add_memory_driver_managed(); >>> >>> Between 2/ and 3/ something can race and think that it owns the >>> region. Do I think it will happen in practice, no, but it's still a >>> pattern that deserves come cleanup. >> >> I think in that unlikely event (rather impossible), add_memory_driver_managed() should fail, detecting a conflicting (busy) resource. Not sure what will happen next ( and did not double-check). > > add_memory_driver_managed() will fail, but the release_mem_region() in > kmem to unwind on the error path will do the wrong thing because that > other driver thinks it got ownership of the region. > I think if somebody would race and claim the region for itself (after we unchecked the BUSY flag), there would be another memory resource below our resource container (e.g., via __request_region()). So, interestingly, the current code will do a release_resource->__release_resource(old, true); which will remove whatever somebody added below the resource. If we were to do a remove_resource->__release_resource(old, false); we would only remove what we temporarily added, relocating anychildren (someone nasty added). But yeah, I don't think we have to worry about this case. >> But yeah, the way the BUSY bit is cleared here is wrong - simply overwriting other bits. And it would be even better if we could avoid manually messing with flags here. > > I'm ok to leave it alone for now (hasn't been and likely never will be > a problem in practice), but I think it was still worth grumbling Definitely, it gives us a better understanding. > about. I'll leave that part of kmem alone in the upcoming split of > dax_kmem_res removal. Yeah, stuff is more complicated than I would wished, so I guess it's better to leave it alone for now until we actually see issues with somebody else regarding *our* device-owned region (or we're able to come up with a cleanup that keeps all corner cases working for kmem and virtio-mem). -- Thanks, David / dhildenb