Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932596AbWHDLda (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:33:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932599AbWHDLda (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:33:30 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:10167 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932596AbWHDLd3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:33:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:31:56 +0900 From: Yasunori Goto To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [1/5] not-aligned memory hotadd handling fix Cc: kmannth@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20060803163302.6D84.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20060802233802.8186eb38.akpm@osdl.org> <20060803163302.6D84.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer-Plugin: BkASPil for Becky!2 Ver.2.063 Message-Id: <20060804202233.D5D0.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.02 [ja] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1664 Lines: 41 > > > After Keith's report of memory hotadd failure, I increased test patterns. > > > These patches are a result of new patterns. But I cannot cover all existing > > > memory layout in the world, more tests are needed. > > > Now, I think my patch can make things better and want this codes to be tested > > > in -mm.patche series is consitsts of 5 patches. > > > > I expect the code which these patches touch is completely untested in -mm, so > > all we'll get is compile testing and some review. > > > > Given that these patches touch pretty much nothing but the memory hot-add > > paths I'd be inclined to fast-track them into 2.6.18. Do you agree that > > these patches are sufficiently safe and that the problems that they solve > > are sufficiently serious for us to take that approach? > > > > Either way, could I ask that interested parties review this work closely > > and promptly? > > Hmm. I reviewed them a bit, and I couldn't find any problems. > > However, my ia64 box is same of his. And emulation environment is very > close too. So, my perspective must be very similar from him. > I think my review is not enough. Keith-san's test is better if he can. > > Anyway, I'll test them with -mm. Something different environment > may be good for test. I tested them (includes 6/5) with -mm. There is no regression on my emulation. Acked-by: Yasunori Goto -- Yasunori Goto - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/