Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:33:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:33:00 -0500 Received: from mel-rti21.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.19.94]:61321 "EHLO mel-rti21.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:32:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 02:27:31 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Lengard X-X-Sender: To: Alan Cox cc: Samuli Suonpaa , Subject: Re: apm suspend broken ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I, byt the way, had my Latitude suspend perfectly with 2.4.12-ac5. > > Now, with 2.4.13-ac[34] pressing Fn+Suspend just blanks the screen (it > > doesn't shut it off, _just_ blanks it) and hangs the machine. > > > > Any ideas on how to proceed in order to find out where the problem > > lies? > > Find exactly which -ac it broke in. If you do a binary search through a few > patch levels you should be able to pin it down. At that point I can chase it I tested "plain" 2.4.12 from Linus and it suffer the same problem. Pressing Fn+Suspend does nothing on my Dell Latitude C600, so I thought it would not be usefull to test against 2.4.12-ac. Tell me if I am plain wrong on this, otherwise, I guess my problem is not exactly the same than Samuli Suonpaa's. >From the last thread on this subject, I could narrow down the problem between 2.4.9 (working) and 2.4.10 (broken), so I did not test against -ac. I rather tested against 2.4.10-preXX. I hope this is not a problem. Sumary: ------- Hardware: Dell Latitude C600 When apm is broken, pressing Fn+Suspend does nothing and launching "apm -s" returns "apm: Resource temporarily unavailable". 2.4.9 ==> apm works 2.4.10-pre8 ==> apm works 2.4.10-pre10 ==> apm works 2.4.10-pre11 ==> apm works 2.4.10-pre12 ==> apm broken 2.4.10 ==> apm broken 2.4.12 ==> apm broken 2.4.13 ==> apm broken The problem appeared in 2.4.10-pre12. I read the Changelog but it is not precise enough for me :-), I started to diff between pre11 and pre12 but I need a sleep now ... I already compiled to much kernels for tonight ! I am ready to test other things if I can help on this issue. Where could I get patches between pre11 and pre12 in small chunks to start some experimentation ? Pascal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/