Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1073532pxk; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 05:40:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyEyR1weYine4hC7Ovu3oydsPQDreqOk5lAw9WxfpU30Q2RpxbSaFWE/x6b2dGN3hSBSs6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:390d:: with SMTP id f13mr2498420eje.86.1601037629451; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 05:40:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601037629; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GsM4GbXN75iOHsacvfg2+OeU5LPoAkz4W7Nb4ObIUC3WZ/COqI+BDWHf9/1L+C5Lvp 5ofwMFUCZZMr4ZySEWuCdcf9l2Cj7up+ED0CBl4Pe7/2S+m02vkkQYTwh5Uay3Vb/Q8I ivbxvO5ddCWV66K30EUiA00WR4JENLluI7lG+Squc+04p/Um3FvwOfejCkVCr7kxsQ2F hfGMZEd/Y+LBKb0+eXswiJTi6Jv6LTv7mxv9LFNAqODsmt6hHE2/VDgCLpwwk6vGym4I HIFlRJBBjLVxXWFTVFlkq34NV7QeB8x8XShX1SqIXdryHR+yFpqNAsKg0LRP8X0fHDdf iM9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=9+ETZFBB2T3G0pHYyzjdCHymF7hNCm5BONtR8ywrMPI=; b=SDg9fG300TR9n7l8xtCPgzDODpJgfCUwVfbVinDnFaZraR3QiltBYQd+kn9npZREVs 5ZT6z7XEF4ChC96YVlOttrgFyiSmp/1TP+gimpGbeA3x1i3lTMoe+5pybiTEssOskmVd lT8VUxZvFFxFn/Vihr0Fa7T+zRcZEU5jk7IK0oQbQbarAZB910SqmrjhQDSRfI8ReWvu wL8uDSTgvUC6rnIoMaX37zno5czb8S6e9X5usMDc6VOU1cOwe1zcO/PAkNSHLoAD/Z0s O80CnxTfry4v8TIQtIk0BVEcOETTlT/xQlJqtXi/+5swEAxwcBo9JAw0Fi2xSU0SxppA d4Ow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 12si1648047ejn.498.2020.09.25.05.40.05; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 05:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728466AbgIYMiQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:38:16 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46024 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726368AbgIYMiQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:38:16 -0400 Received: from gaia (unknown [31.124.44.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 200A721D7A; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:38:10 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Vincenzo Frascino Cc: Andrey Konovalov , Dmitry Vyukov , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Marco Elver , Evgenii Stepanov , Elena Petrova , Branislav Rankov , Kevin Brodsky , Will Deacon , Andrew Morton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 29/39] arm64: mte: Switch GCR_EL1 in kernel entry and exit Message-ID: <20200925123810.GL4846@gaia> References: <4e503a54297cf46ea1261f43aa325c598d9bd73e.1600987622.git.andreyknvl@google.com> <20200925113433.GF4846@gaia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: > On 9/25/20 12:34 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:50:36AM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > >> + /* > >> + * Calculate and set the exclude mask preserving > >> + * the RRND (bit[16]) setting. > >> + */ > >> + mrs_s \tmp2, SYS_GCR_EL1 > >> + bfi \tmp2, \tmp, #0, #16 > >> + msr_s SYS_GCR_EL1, \tmp2 > >> + isb > >> +1: > >> +#endif > >> + .endm > >> + > >> + .macro mte_set_kernel_gcr, tsk, tmp, tmp2 > > > > What's the point of a 'tsk' argument here? > > It is unused. I kept the interface same in between kernel and user. > I can either add a comment or remove it. Which one do you prefer? Please remove it. Having the same interface is more confusing since you have a single kernel gcr_excl but multiple user gcr_excl. -- Catalin