Message-ID: <44D3603D.90802@sw.ru>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:57:01 +0400
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, vatsa@in.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu,
       nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, sam@vilain.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       dev@openvz.org, efault@gmx.de, balbir@in.ibm.com, sekharan@us.ibm.com,
       nagar@watson.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A	cpu
 controller
References: <20060804050753.GD27194@in.ibm.com>	 <20060803223650.423f2e6a.akpm@osdl.org>	 <20060803224253.49068b98.akpm@osdl.org> <1154684950.23655.178.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1154684950.23655.178.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 901
Lines: 22


>>The downside to such a strategy is that there is a risk that nobody ever
>>gets around to implementing useful controllers, so it ends up dead code. 
>>I'd judge that the interest in resource management is such that the risk of
>>this happening is low.
> 
> 
> I think the risk is that OpenVZ has all the controls and resource
> managers we need, while CKRM is still more research-ish. I find the
> OpenVZ code much clearer, cleaner and complete at the moment, although
> also much more conservative in its approach to solving problems.

Alan, I will be happy to hear what you mean by conservative :)
Maybe we can make it more revolutinary then.

Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/