Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:26:47 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc:     paulmck <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@efficios.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracepoints: Add helper to test if tracepoint is
 enabled in a header
Message-ID: <20200925122647.230decde@oasis.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <965650354.69699.1601047806662.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
References: <20200924170928.466191266@goodmis.org>
        <20200924153517.73f5f257@oasis.local.home>
        <221547373.69067.1600977935633.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <20200924161328.760f5e79@oasis.local.home>
        <1430794518.69084.1600979254425.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <20200924163331.0080b943@oasis.local.home>
        <176393901.69671.1601044916547.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <20200925111415.60f5334c@oasis.local.home>
        <965650354.69699.1601047806662.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:30:06 -0400 (EDT)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:

> > Anyway, I don't see any issues with the current patch set as is
> > (besides the documentation fix, which I already updated locally). And
> > will add this to my queue for linux-next.  
> 
> The only thing I would change in the documentation is to word this as
> "here is a trampoline trick which can be used to work-around rare cases
> of tracepoint header circular dependency issues" rather than "always use
> this when instrumenting a header".
> 

I rather not have tracepoints in headers. Period!

It's not just about circular dependencies, it also bloats the code.

-- Steve