Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200922031918.3723-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
 <20200922031918.3723-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> <20200922194232.GA2505291@kernel.org>
 <4db737f2-0705-5183-6971-9031acfd123b@linux.intel.com> <20200925180527.GA2883319@kernel.org>
 <20200925183614.czoqgq2kcttzfm2g@two.firstfloor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200925183614.czoqgq2kcttzfm2g@two.firstfloor.org>
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:43:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXp8brNy7tCTAp4H1uegnCkrBxCiacz14+K3TY4_t3hVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
To:     Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
        Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:36 AM Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, it now works, but then... You forgot to add the Cc: entries for
> > all the people in your actual e-mail Cc: list, and also the
> > Reviewed-by: from Andy, I had to do it all manually, so when I applied
> > your attachments with 'git am' I needed to go on and manually collect
> > all the Cc, Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags.
>
> For the event updates we should just use git pulls in my opinion.
>
> They are just too large for the normal review procedures, and usually
> don't really benefit much from community review anyways because they
> are essentially hardware documentation.
>
> Should just name intel / amd / etc. event list maintainers and you
> could accept pulls from them.
>
> -Andi

Are the scripts to make the json available? Perhaps then Arnaldo could
generate the changes.

I believe Kajol Jain has some unmerged changes because there's a worry
about the interaction with the scripts and assumptions in jevents.
Having access to the scripts would mean that we could fix whatever
issues there would be.

Thanks,
Ian