Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1410357pxk; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:08:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyp1Vc0/8aI4AP8IE5ManEAmCAbPfqKC3Y+dNbFsrf2DHWqiKWnPogxT16HxJJqle9+8daw X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fcc7:: with SMTP id qx7mr4872484ejb.254.1601068095068; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:08:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601068095; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Y/3eanmphZJYCKPXfsDsD3ZyiXTZQE9PeHeWtkvkQGKWYiVHX7UY5/gg4dVJeecI1n C9jdn8JIbTYO48MlyL22dT399kOPpNLQAemtStkofNlWTmq/jtjmPZslcrK9GS1Rr1oq xQYJBIumlkUj8sW2V6GRVE21guox1/3N+OoXCuudhKYOKd2aLP2t/nu9p4Y0AFqAr9pA gEQPP5EFdfxxNh5+YrKOW2/7J/CtFNr7BD7D33P5G+40FXwwiD28VHlLnEh5ILztb87o L5blx5uiqRGt/kkVU3RoJOeQwK2NfNbKaHZSVoB94OsInijNnB7HHZPjVnHYJzIzN8Rk orWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=Nph2D9IVfI+xvuD8zFp+f/GwIX9O4qj0XvwXCm0EYyg=; b=vINa/DPZlL66+BEpwrmIrKBcbLE7k3Nd4GWsdQfNXkeFLqpFazU+E3k9CKg+lc0tzv CoANmRPHLZV44Ku2X5/wqKbSmcsZeL6/Um9X1qMDYNhcC7RpA7vQrPE/SGLSWOfJyAP5 QRuV8SeIpDHqYH26GkAuvrbxubOAmDITk94FSzJc+JeD4AryLuI7VX747lAhAMeV/BzT UgGFJgumSCHdKidbnNSJ+rc++Q1o4uFE96xEO++KSQEiDAcvcKRbOSP6q1xHVI3XfG4F Phc5J5ZTAXfopSwFCyPIDRO7x2QGr4UROMI7lBF+fruivr0266RhOL+Ouz2r7EmWNKIH SW1w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=eode0v0J; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k7si2744752edq.438.2020.09.25.14.07.52; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=eode0v0J; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727701AbgIYVGR (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:06:17 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:32950 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726064AbgIYVGQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:06:16 -0400 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601067975; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Nph2D9IVfI+xvuD8zFp+f/GwIX9O4qj0XvwXCm0EYyg=; b=eode0v0JDaBStoNf9D8IQ0OnSNCRb8Uc/Foqr3IlCZ9i4OIG0+GVAHcVJ88vWX0aajY1ol 8G1SzWVlgs+DtrUdtF5Fxqe0U3WTieIaR7GqG+igy83VI/zNGsx9JHEOdTTT/q5Z9wh8lb vk2UGfGiigeU7ZTvOddvj4FeOE9UlpY= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-192-w9gZ3gZWOJmYy4DV6Iwizw-1; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:06:13 -0400 X-MC-Unique: w9gZ3gZWOJmYy4DV6Iwizw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id t8so125963wmj.6 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:06:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nph2D9IVfI+xvuD8zFp+f/GwIX9O4qj0XvwXCm0EYyg=; b=Lh7cVt1y6rL3LcpihSzkNYnm6IIg2ELkSZTvZRnet35PQ3hmSY2SyqssNzV1/8nlHk M+haP8ZGugUeWk/Z4gFDjt5oZj8xCXsERY+nrli5mdiFJdPsDO3w9+oaNyeh4RPeU+Rf OXwY+On4E+6IxYFYtczwv0Z6FbAXE6MR/wbuk+EwAOk+8O+FgszCfToNRXePcK4/1t8g zhPT7TQWPQuWpkMP2tUlObU8kWpPHBoDGd2xWh74+c1uOFXxtgByrg3r/7Y9VnHv7qZN XE6++RhVqz5bu98v5rwib9tNTKHHX5yXnc8aOg6+4146yycpP8wKTTH83rnroKOBg9mI Jzrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533slwgFf5I0gPWvAb100kf2D57RxhTaTWRMEQzExk0xYW6oGZjc cfv8Gq8WjgiQ9w9321Ml50lolX6X0QlqpTuMRIBtAOrIn4zBpY18WCbeOrfHaWtfRxuQD6prNkM i1LBRWyMBrp2uxSmKOusIRGgr X-Received: by 2002:adf:f207:: with SMTP id p7mr6889813wro.152.1601067972440; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:06:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:f207:: with SMTP id p7mr6889795wro.152.1601067972235; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:ec9b:111a:97e3:4baf? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:ec9b:111a:97e3:4baf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t203sm255701wmg.43.2020.09.25.14.06.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: Use KVM_BUG/KVM_BUG_ON to handle bugs that are fatal to the VM To: Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda References: <20200923224530.17735-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20200923224530.17735-4-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <878scze4l5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20200924181134.GB9649@linux.intel.com> <87k0wichht.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20200925171233.GC31528@linux.intel.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <731dd323-8c66-77ff-cf15-4bbdea34bcf9@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 23:06:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200925171233.GC31528@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/09/20 19:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> Do we actually want to prevent *all* ioctls? E.g. when 'vm bugged' >> condition is triggered userspace may want to extract some information to >> assist debugging but even things like KVM_GET_[S]REGS will just return >> -EIO. I'm not sure it is generally safe to enable *everything* (except >> for KVM_RUN which should definitely be forbidden) so maybe your approach >> is preferable. > > The answer to this probably depends on the answer to the first question of > when it's appropriate to use KVM_BUG(). E.g. if we limit usage to fatal or > dangrous cases, then blocking all ioctls() is probably the right thing do do. I think usage should be limited to dangerous cases, basically WARN_ON level. However I agree with Vitaly that KVM_GET_* should be allowed. The other question is whether to return -EIO or KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR. The latter is more likely to be handled already by userspace. Paolo