Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1443647pxk; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:17:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxB7cbU+xPJ+4MWYBxATpDRzkBrSHG3Q+wchWwvTFeU+HcEj6FyTu5UmaXdn3sDSzg3mng5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ce4b:: with SMTP id se11mr4803447ejb.386.1601072250246; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:17:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601072250; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iH4DH7ajZ6sIFWbSt77Ne5+vuP0209cKseHOD6xNkg+fEVI3vXtiugoz0Zf/da/d9L dEL1XSyB9MTHN4cpLBx7T1jWR4xXaxCVxim2uHbaU1XxXUBUkvPCFbkUhW5bneypqx70 C39B3+NoF5Fy9Wf0WlJo7CjYv3LXu9bWh36QBjOdNndhYPfHd/tMZf1h8PhWj4yCIXZE KjJRtKeb++YM2UxMfpSHoU+gBBftjTlTYC/L1kKSg9LbApjJKd0fWhv0yGCM+TazkC1O Qq/QMk873L4tK+IP/FoLT8fYMQwpynQ/m6GJHRuK2hIvrpd8F/P8bfqL8JS5bHxB0dFm GVSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=vCY9vqtysfnYAzOXXJpJKWU70rngZTHa7RVQsOMxGjI=; b=PXw1gvo1Mlm9fsQwyvfNNhYoiwqdJC/kEPHxXDxYfpypiRDWqh4sGNoBpOFPj8zK1/ te+0kQCC2/ojQp8yvOPrCi4fgV7BPhebjU4A5Y3ElbeegOYgPOXgwL8P7xFpHf0S1jvp 3mC7izlw1eZyJgd+2rgDo0Qos0NAJwP6jot0WWxQryT3TPCxQv8bnwpf6tfD2evwTwWJ WeWncD0JP5DT9R8NRz/kvSPOq/bcAitBoiyKeii6AjZvnInqOZiME6GoPBxuBYMKNr1K c80tFB3V7TyV1WqUR4Ofbtj1nRW9ZLv5B3R+9NF2yhMi281/V4e/WR3GhWp3XS5+hzaV A3qA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=RcIyO0tB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x11si2734260edl.498.2020.09.25.15.17.06; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=RcIyO0tB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728736AbgIYWPo (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:15:44 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49874 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728171AbgIYWPn (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:15:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (52.sub-72-107-123.myvzw.com [72.107.123.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C4C820809; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 22:15:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601072143; bh=2hOV9JcU0J5teRkwVCkPUAdtrzsWK+/gvtfXSFG9gKI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=RcIyO0tBv5W8bvTSwQuG+AmEbMYPIgticU24c5R6clNFnWEZOUEmotZ6v0c3OJd87 c0fqGPjVWEpqUBqVonwUPPNetdlWFxKZrfmKencCLDtHrklWXCxrO+lmwTUXhfx0Hs xQWr1ExTU3yA4Sg4BSZxvNFHoI2cIvhma1c71mSQ= Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:15:40 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Sean V Kelley Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com, qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sean V Kelley Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/10] PCI/RCEC: Add pcie_link_rcec() to associate RCiEPs Message-ID: <20200925221540.GA2460947@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200922213859.108826-7-seanvk.dev@oregontracks.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:38:55PM -0700, Sean V Kelley wrote: > From: Sean V Kelley > > A Root Complex Event Collector provides support for > terminating error and PME messages from associated RCiEPs. > > Make use of the RCEC Endpoint Association Extended Capability > to identify associated RCiEPs. Link the associated RCiEPs as > the RCECs are enumerated. > > Co-developed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo > Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo > Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley > --- > drivers/pci/pci.h | 2 + > drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c | 3 ++ > drivers/pci/pcie/rcec.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/pci.h | 1 + > 4 files changed, 102 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h > index 7b547fc3679a..ddb5872466fb 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h > @@ -474,9 +474,11 @@ static inline void pci_dpc_init(struct pci_dev *pdev) {} > #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS > void pci_rcec_init(struct pci_dev *dev); > void pci_rcec_exit(struct pci_dev *dev); > +void pcie_link_rcec(struct pci_dev *rcec); > #else > static inline void pci_rcec_init(struct pci_dev *dev) {} > static inline void pci_rcec_exit(struct pci_dev *dev) {} > +static inline void pcie_link_rcec(struct pci_dev *rcec) {} > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_ATS > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c > index 4d880679b9b1..dbeb0155c2c3 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c > @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ static int pcie_portdrv_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, > (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC))) > return -ENODEV; > > + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) > + pcie_link_rcec(dev); Nice solution. One day we'll get rid of pcie_portdrv_probe() and integrate this stuff better into the PCI core, and we'll have to figure out a little different solution then. But we'll be smarter then so it should be possible :) > status = pcie_port_device_register(dev); > if (status) > return status; > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/rcec.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/rcec.c > index 519ae086ff41..5630480a6659 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/rcec.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/rcec.c > @@ -17,6 +17,102 @@ > > #include "../pci.h" > > +struct walk_rcec_data { > + struct pci_dev *rcec; > + int (*user_callback)(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data); > + void *user_data; > +}; > + > +static bool rcec_assoc_rciep(struct pci_dev *rcec, struct pci_dev *rciep) > +{ > + unsigned long bitmap = rcec->rcec_ext->bitmap; > + unsigned int devn; > + > + /* An RCiEP found on bus in range */ > + if (rcec->bus->number != rciep->bus->number) > + return true; > + > + /* Same bus, so check bitmap */ > + for_each_set_bit(devn, &bitmap, 32) > + if (devn == rciep->devfn) > + return true; > + > + return false; > +} > + > +static int link_rcec_helper(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data) > +{ > + struct walk_rcec_data *rcec_data = data; > + struct pci_dev *rcec = rcec_data->rcec; > + > + if ((pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) && rcec_assoc_rciep(rcec, dev)) { > + dev->rcec = rcec; > + pci_dbg(dev, "PME & error events reported via %s\n", pci_name(rcec)); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +void walk_rcec(int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *dev, void *data), void *userdata) > +{ > + struct walk_rcec_data *rcec_data = userdata; > + struct pci_dev *rcec = rcec_data->rcec; > + u8 nextbusn, lastbusn; > + struct pci_bus *bus; > + unsigned int bnr; > + > + if (!rcec->rcec_cap) > + return; > + > + /* Walk own bus for bitmap based association */ > + pci_walk_bus(rcec->bus, cb, rcec_data); > + > + /* Check whether RCEC BUSN register is present */ > + if (rcec->rcec_ext->ver < PCI_RCEC_BUSN_REG_VER) > + return; > + > + nextbusn = rcec->rcec_ext->nextbusn; > + lastbusn = rcec->rcec_ext->lastbusn; > + > + /* All RCiEP devices are on the same bus as the RCEC */ > + if (nextbusn == 0xff && lastbusn == 0x00) > + return; > + > + for (bnr = nextbusn; bnr <= lastbusn; bnr++) { > + /* No association indicated (PCIe 5.0-1, 7.9.10.3) */ > + if (bnr == rcec->bus->number) > + continue; > + > + bus = pci_find_bus(pci_domain_nr(rcec->bus), bnr); > + if (!bus) > + continue; > + > + /* Find RCiEP devices on the given bus ranges */ > + pci_walk_bus(bus, cb, rcec_data); > + } > +} > + > +/** > + * pcie_link_rcec - Link RCiEP devices associating with RCEC. > + * @rcec RCEC whose RCiEP devices should be linked. > + * > + * Link the given RCEC to each RCiEP device found. > + * > + */ > +void pcie_link_rcec(struct pci_dev *rcec) > +{ > + struct walk_rcec_data rcec_data; > + > + if (!rcec->rcec_cap) > + return; > + > + rcec_data.rcec = rcec; > + rcec_data.user_callback = NULL; > + rcec_data.user_data = NULL; > + > + walk_rcec(link_rcec_helper, &rcec_data); > +} > + > void pci_rcec_init(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > u32 rcec, hdr, busn; > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > index 5c5c4eb642b6..ad382a9484ea 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ struct pci_dev { > #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS > u16 rcec_cap; /* RCEC capability offset */ > struct rcec_ext *rcec_ext; /* RCEC cached assoc. endpoint extended capabilities */ > + struct pci_dev *rcec; /* Associated RCEC device */ Wondering if we can put this pointer inside the struct rcec_ext (or whatever we call it) so we don't have to pay *two* pointers for every PCI device? Maybe it should be something like this: struct rcec { u8 ea_ver; u8 ea_nextbusn; u8 ea_lastbusn; u32 ea_bitmap; struct pci_dev *rcec; } I dunno. Not sure if that would be better or worse, since we'd be mixing RCEC stuff (the EA capability info) with RCiEP stuff (the pointer to the related RCEC). Could even be a union, since any given device only needs one of them, but I'm pretty sure that would be worse. BTW, 03/10 didn't add a forward declaration, e.g., struct rcec_ext; to include/linux/pci.h, and the actual definition is in drivers/pci/pci.h. It seems like you should need that? > #endif > u8 pcie_cap; /* PCIe capability offset */ > u8 msi_cap; /* MSI capability offset */ > -- > 2.28.0 >