Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] -mm  clocksource: increase initcall priority
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: dwalker@mvista.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20060804032510.405094000@mvista.com>
References: <20060804032414.304636000@mvista.com>
	 <20060804032510.405094000@mvista.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:39:44 -0700
Message-Id: <1154716784.5327.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 954
Lines: 22

First of all, sorry for not reviewing these patches sooner. Its been
sitting in on my todo list for way too long. Thanks for continuing to
push it despite my slowness.

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 20:24 -0700, dwalker@mvista.com wrote:
> plain text document attachment (clocksource_init_call.patch)
> Since it's likely that this interface would get used during bootup 
> I moved all the clocksource registration into the postcore initcall. 
> This also eliminated some clocksource shuffling during bootup.

This one looks interesting. As long as it works as advertised I'm fine
with it, although I worry it might bring up some initialization ordering
issues. It will need some careful testing in -mm.

thanks
-john

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/