Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/22] kvm: mmu: Add access tracking for tdp_mmu
To:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
        Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
        Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
References: <20200925212302.3979661-1-bgardon@google.com>
 <20200925212302.3979661-15-bgardon@google.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <d7964716-8949-a4ac-93ce-a71f3aebbd12@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Sep 2020 02:32:18 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200925212302.3979661-15-bgardon@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 25/09/20 23:22, Ben Gardon wrote:
> @@ -332,7 +331,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_ad_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return vcpu->arch.mmu == &vcpu->arch.guest_mmu;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool spte_ad_enabled(u64 spte)
> +inline bool spte_ad_enabled(u64 spte)
>  {
>  	MMU_WARN_ON(is_mmio_spte(spte));
>  	return (spte & SPTE_SPECIAL_MASK) != SPTE_AD_DISABLED_MASK;
> @@ -607,7 +606,7 @@ int is_last_spte(u64 pte, int level)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static bool is_executable_pte(u64 spte)
> +bool is_executable_pte(u64 spte)
>  {
>  	return (spte & (shadow_x_mask | shadow_nx_mask)) == shadow_x_mask;
>  }
> @@ -791,7 +790,7 @@ static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> -static bool is_accessed_spte(u64 spte)
> +bool is_accessed_spte(u64 spte)
>  {
>  	u64 accessed_mask = spte_shadow_accessed_mask(spte);
>  
> @@ -941,7 +940,7 @@ static u64 mmu_spte_get_lockless(u64 *sptep)
>  	return __get_spte_lockless(sptep);
>  }
>  
> -static u64 mark_spte_for_access_track(u64 spte)
> +u64 mark_spte_for_access_track(u64 spte)
>  {
>  	if (spte_ad_enabled(spte))
>  		return spte & ~shadow_accessed_mask;

More candidates for inlining, of course.

Paolo