Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1529589pxk; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:13:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz33T21ENwcqpWMNHb/XuflkrHiacFq3xnbH3Q0V1/TkIq5cDBs2ZCuWKq4XagjoAfUSqb5 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:db47:: with SMTP id n7mr4293175edt.315.1601082835095; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:13:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601082835; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OuQwjhj3+TsKYL/WnYXUE9ZL9vef4O0cFU41afNdK0JpnbPJ+KoICup4oUV233+ENh y4LiiODQfhR4y1C8GqTD3DZSPqIu7HQLsyuAWucIvTUc3ZON7hkS7Nki2hcD7/TDWz7d dIlO4supJOIBN1JiO/ixIMpULjhByeYm3Py+4IgL36AAyMJlmdbJ1Z4wQKrWzp82UlJ9 qefPIi8jsBbQC4Si9MQeq90HhEkG2msq3KLvrQqh1BkmoFeiai6bviJzuCmcpmafLsLB gWl1lXqh+JP2bS5eVm2nnFEIyEuigKUhEjs68WcoZFspz/ZTcvwQWZRfnRk8n+6QArvD oCyQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=xhIG5lIeSniauUXqSeFzOVd/HOplR5lP9oJTjmYBwr4=; b=XDgpyiaeYd3s3qOaibpyNOUEpREAm2OZjJPVlwBcOJVcR0laEcbtjpmjDSCBR8lqmo PvpQYtrZqQFu6rlv78Elwxg3RexTxcjdWHIVv+iQJBhLasindC1YSBe4gUj5dOkcb+K8 78EJctHtFCgjHjF/gTjczcE87Ue+1kYy0DS15/gfNJ+EtyiQgS33v5CAUoGLSCIQ72Ob loBQYRlOsiy1kqyF8xEunZT1JNT1jyfP/aaycjyjHlQ5Z5T7DZSHhvlJVse22wiXQQ4q ft3oHyA9GuPTr1CM2MmMEF1t4U5saQ1igYPCgn/WZmFyRtA6J7pS3WP0jUZWfnAUxE4H ouZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=bjCkUS6u; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cw20si3114267edb.141.2020.09.25.18.13.30; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=bjCkUS6u; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729822AbgIZBJV (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:09:21 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:51633 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726210AbgIZBJV (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:09:21 -0400 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601082560; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xhIG5lIeSniauUXqSeFzOVd/HOplR5lP9oJTjmYBwr4=; b=bjCkUS6uzeBjJO6K608YdfNwzZQdkYZNySCfjVieEYnJazlXsqWnL2z7W/luUeT3Qp+bMC +FK+Jkx73vLFhDwBDzo1c/Ti4CQk4AXtXMZYMglrXdfbjgUVPjjugEthrmCCiDrSXhIEjJ slhrYnH0+9NLkCuugk70leP4u+VpKpk= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-92-LDnZj4BXMJGA5FfbetSJ0Q-1; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:09:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LDnZj4BXMJGA5FfbetSJ0Q-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id b20so272939wmj.1 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:09:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xhIG5lIeSniauUXqSeFzOVd/HOplR5lP9oJTjmYBwr4=; b=N9BaK/iPR0zbBz4v2eOlFa2/rQRlpob8gTzutSlxZzaWF6u0uh8Dh4EXQj/UCigOIc +AFcNdu63xaXZylESXu4IIdFSo8LmlF8SBkoooncc80pjyQBhiLDIu2vmSzd9nLsoQd9 /LGnhr8rU6CsLfG4CGftvhdUOLnnXqENKgKGhLNEPXriUAFVV54KdsJDluhnHjUKA0ti nM60DSqEZIp9UEemX/7yZR7yaxjoZAeLaHw35tIK9DK/Drs1HovW4eo6a9MwsFrifuFo DSZi+Mj2N0/+UntE+x7E1lI7VkNyfLhBLsCjk+wBgPyVHsiQAHUZrVJsLhxcnZKmzOiM 77dQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Wk6zeOZQrTaRX9HkyNXyKYHYA5voBIYjKdbfiiJS/Z3djxE9r PRAPJbolkzhHzOCo1+qYNClA/I8YMwQFlrarsyqA8RgM+2F31oKwmynDEsbkI+8VStAcxlwh+f2 bczSnOL3tk5j/NAhvXA3eRtE8 X-Received: by 2002:a1c:31c6:: with SMTP id x189mr247361wmx.83.1601082557852; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:09:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a1c:31c6:: with SMTP id x189mr247346wmx.83.1601082557623; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:ec9b:111a:97e3:4baf? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:ec9b:111a:97e3:4baf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n14sm732281wmi.33.2020.09.25.18.09.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] kvm: mmu: Support disabling dirty logging for the tdp MMU To: Ben Gardon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Cannon Matthews , Peter Xu , Sean Christopherson , Peter Shier , Peter Feiner , Junaid Shahid , Jim Mattson , Yulei Zhang , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Xiao Guangrong References: <20200925212302.3979661-1-bgardon@google.com> <20200925212302.3979661-19-bgardon@google.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <44822999-f5dc-6116-db12-a41f5bd80dd8@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 03:09:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200925212302.3979661-19-bgardon@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/09/20 23:22, Ben Gardon wrote: > + for_each_tdp_pte_root(iter, root, start, end) { > + if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte) || > + is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level)) > + continue; > + I'm starting to wonder if another iterator like for_each_tdp_leaf_pte_root would be clearer, since this idiom repeats itself quite often. The tdp_iter_next_leaf function would be easily implemented as while (likely(iter->valid) && (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte) || is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level)) tdp_iter_next(iter); Paolo