Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp2155975pxk; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 20:01:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw09ZKDkqmAs+ITHkxSaLC/nvwfcwqjPsTeZWEg2mYqBp/iysWyN3V7q4Y0knj0BzwSMkDP X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b88e:: with SMTP id hb14mr9445151ejb.543.1601175716838; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 20:01:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601175716; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j0wXq7NUQHEBkyG4suAn+qJIqM4hJxAZKRhNlggB4kMaYnLF94WrUDQfVSx0+QlcEN hESxPoLlQueYMwrTxDD2gjGls9ERtobLLkt1M+6eB58Rsy7425Laf0yDtW4bcvkvvzKZ Uad/2XM8Pu7ZsFch/k6P31aG6IXbCrr5vngilzip4eZLidkneEFr+2GgI/BRD47NJOkE ai9SFkUSqtF2/zgnDaG2Cbm+u6sktOSblYGVd2mGGMSCYszYKHZdjAXQIzLPTeMqGGot 6Pxf/FeQwPt+XkMLYhfT//CfYB33JkIwcwAi0zKC7MKPc2fvdPy8ZcG+MRAytxTtG9Gc k2Dg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=8wKRKiGrNHEwKVEh44SvK1KEJdNUKCGJMyjunP7k1Ec=; b=BgewNsO6aT98BhcHP3qoQYFDsosgXyuyLD5oZEGK/LV1xsxXBDAK0qtfbgUD2m0kyd hVGGhgbGZTzSfQvYmsu+/q1lRpxboaDSb/fWv3bjl3FEdruqWDjH+2syWeSNCQpf388V qfPkkODiBNpjMZwP99gB0eq+T9tZprhNZQtkhc81XRLR1tNpWh31CBwUdP8I3pxccKB3 e81MmWElznA3pvENYC6j4/tU/ahNcgV9sWAfdnc4UiH+P/USG9qb1HVzy4+xSonNJ6o2 Litf2zENTPFTBdvK3363hgFHZPOEPlE7VBK1JHqnLyFbYctdSAtXofP2TqvSJ8AW+LZj o/Rw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m21si4635503ejq.199.2020.09.26.20.01.33; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 20:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729883AbgI0C7l (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 26 Sep 2020 22:59:41 -0400 Received: from out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.131]:49410 "EHLO out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726840AbgI0C7l (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Sep 2020 22:59:41 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R851e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04357;MF=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UA9zx-2_1601175578; Received: from JosephdeMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UA9zx-2_1601175578) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:59:38 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix potential soft lockup during fstrim To: Gang He , mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org References: <20200927015815.14904-1-ghe@suse.com> From: Joseph Qi Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:59:38 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200927015815.14904-1-ghe@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/9/27 09:58, Gang He wrote: > When we discard unused blocks on a mounted ocfs2 filesystem, fstrim > handles each block goup with locking/unlocking global bitmap meta-file > repeatedly. we should let fstrim thread take a break(if need) between > unlock and lock, this will avoid the potential soft lockup problem, > and also gives the upper applications more IO opportunities, these > applications are not blocked for too long at writing files. > > Signed-off-by: Gang He It makes sense. Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi > --- > fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c > index 4c1b90442d6f..2cf9321919b5 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c > @@ -7654,8 +7654,10 @@ int ocfs2_trim_mainbm(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range) > * main_bm related locks for avoiding the current IO starve, then go to > * trim the next group > */ > - if (ret >= 0 && group <= last_group) > + if (ret >= 0 && group <= last_group) { > + cond_resched(); > goto next_group; > + } > out: > range->len = trimmed * sb->s_blocksize; > return ret; >