Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <0e8e87e25c90339fe790252626855cbb47bc2c08.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: mark PRINTK_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_MASK in
 __schedule()
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com,
        sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, songmuchun@bytedance.com
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:52:44 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20200928073202.GA2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20200927161130.33172-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
         <20200927161130.33172-2-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
         <20200928073202.GA2611@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 09:32 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:11:30AM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> > The WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE with rq lock held in __schedule() should be
> > deferred by marking the PRINTK_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_MASK, or will cause
> > deadlock on rq lock in the printk path.
[]
> NAK printk_deferred is an abomination, kill that.

Didn't you introduce it?
Should you be complaining to yourself?

---

commit 3ccf3e8306156a28213adc720aba807e9a901ad5
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date:   Mon Feb 27 10:47:00 2012 +0100

    printk/sched: Introduce special printk_sched() for those awkward moments
    
    There's a few awkward printk()s inside of scheduler guts that people
    prefer to keep but really are rather deadlock prone. Fudge around it
    by storing the text in a per-cpu buffer and poll it using the existing
    printk_tick() handler.
    
    This will drop output when its more frequent than once a tick, however
    only the affinity thing could possible go that fast and for that just
    one should suffice to notify the admin he's done something silly..
    
    Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
    Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-wua3lmkt3dg8nfts66o6brne@git.kernel.org
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

commit aac74dc495456412c4130a1167ce4beb6c1f0b38
Author: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed Jun 4 16:11:40 2014 -0700

    printk: rename printk_sched to printk_deferred
    
    After learning we'll need some sort of deferred printk functionality in
    the timekeeping core, Peter suggested we rename the printk_sched function
    so it can be reused by needed subsystems.
    
    This only changes the function name. No logic changes.
    
    Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
    Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
    Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
    Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
    Cc: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
    Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
    Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>