Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161597AbWHELKE (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:10:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161596AbWHELKE (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:10:04 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([205.233.218.70]:34995 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161594AbWHELKC (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:10:02 -0400 Subject: Re: ELF: what should be part of the userspace headers? From: David Woodhouse To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-audit@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060805110559.GU25692@stusta.de> References: <20060805110559.GU25692@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 19:08:43 +0800 Message-Id: <1154776124.5181.57.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.6.dwmw2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 721 Lines: 20 On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 13:05 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > include/linux/elf-em.h is used by include/linux/audit.h, but this usage > doesn't seem to be part of the kernel <-> userspace interface? The machine types _are_ part of the audit kernel<->userspace interface, I think. Exporting elf-em.h should be fairly harmless. > And which part of the ELF headers is part of the kernel <-> userspace > interface? Almost none of them, I'd suggest. Nothing but auxvec.h -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/