Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp2952085pxk; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:50:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHZsA06toi5mOnVEISCgeaOJNZNCQco3X326X6UtOaM1WhZzpVMLAnO+NfW/U+Ypx3ZXwj X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:304f:: with SMTP id bu15mr1262946edb.201.1601293818000; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:50:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601293817; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QCfLIzu/JCFWY3bIsSo63uWOHbM7UJX/dqWhZAbqoTecaDaPwa8lNPQCIs1G+9H0KN SruK1cUBT/05rqJO9bWNlQTf21vC4p1xG83ETYtZiu0e0OQO6k35w1DtRQ676lLB2Bk5 1+IiYiIZ9vCG9LJ1lkIsQv75nHLooWICL96pGKriaSsrVpXUXMjPWFyPMJyDdaJUIvk2 8RsXo3u/cgffr4ho7UF+acTrrKl/rybDab6HFy7cs6nHUj+wqKqfnggQXaOY7qWcardv vxALpfHHGIiEmx0Zua+PIm6QzfLoxXvOkkRlw1u/OEWN84Scpy4IJRwIsK0Toj8YM48L 0gxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=zwMUcY3XkwfnX4NVH144ezfRaJEZAmC6LlLKw8bGZ/0=; b=zC0hpWMNUJdsU1nLN2xIvvVYmfpqGVUqLP4XkDh2pBO7ABchj3fjYwUyfxuxAWeBNB mI5n1FbVBq0bCME8ewF+WoVBod64APV2/sa12QZaYQv+DrKdj/cwIpxKy81RuMKWKi16 cN57laVljUryKtODk5CcEnji8FLsW8OKuYiz5ZVRsddnl/Kfgs/QftXt5WakytlYyBIZ HtCfBvHG1alFISXECOm/zoCGPtSIGb5rBwqrt+apv/2B7dqod+15rh7pzAoLtYX/MwX7 IMbrX+yMFMNQEyreFjEMuyRMcZiA/1f0KItnbrydwi8PQLssvildagtwTfXMAy6x++Io xHwQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qL0R40R1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p16si426078edm.382.2020.09.28.04.49.54; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qL0R40R1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726640AbgI1LqQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:46:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43058 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726420AbgI1LqP (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:46:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com (mail-pf1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE55C061755; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id b124so734348pfg.13; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:46:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zwMUcY3XkwfnX4NVH144ezfRaJEZAmC6LlLKw8bGZ/0=; b=qL0R40R1HA602EvKkHEmXf7m4tvAZFldTIc1GF5GjGaILZ9rOwkQ/I2iO8MnXWgx0I yhiAYRaD040/rpIuPM8UOeQkWh7pzR0jtEP/eTDnMEcbaut/MA1MxVWPuSKP4UEx5f9+ dHRx+5nr77YrIx1s4z5YRXPz/8+VDYwNuXI+PQp02/c5vA5KhqkOnvQhJzNE4mBdEGPL wGUm5UMzS7W22UOBoQy2mtU9lsPHwh5u96uR0aYW7HCYRCWqc3W1DzMuYit6q3rJ/SVi Y9jB2M38jp3EkO61YysrX8v1Jy8THQe3KwBVk+qbIxiaNK10kF17IFWeL43+7Xa4Jhrd xOzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zwMUcY3XkwfnX4NVH144ezfRaJEZAmC6LlLKw8bGZ/0=; b=PUekF+CkylkXUZh6MM/kM/1rfIrOT+TCylJZAAKCu2YH+hwuKaCOGzxzbbST++4pgI ffgHJ57FvJviQa3ZcmuqWaEIYur1ChY4qv3bq7IOpfds0fdJcsDUaZoFd5vALbPE3s8e XpPyC6IWPFr6kxZv8VHZcPPZNRKEcUMQ7zedouV/vJtldScDYlZK+5m+sJk82nNUUHcw bVKy9iPYOiepuW207PYYfN2f9Ad67woVy4CtXV8StEIOQXIUUqKlPrfjlPlxHJ1aJJRA 9Ms0NJ0FS7LpodZx7bfaImEx8eHRg01+n/NAjGerrew4/pQtYKsiWioWfDwRAWZVKYSM VnkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hqagputjN49JzGSqPjou3WDO2p0Nl+Y1LoF8q0GYky3oM3rF0 hkgUZhn5CHYp1SVOajGHFR9xCBtI78nD0hSzzMI= X-Received: by 2002:a63:ec4c:: with SMTP id r12mr841807pgj.74.1601293575223; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:46:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200920203207.25696-1-lists@wildgooses.com> <815ff3a6-8941-573d-36c0-36639f47dc04@wildgooses.com> In-Reply-To: <815ff3a6-8941-573d-36c0-36639f47dc04@wildgooses.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:45:56 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: gpio-amd-fch: Fix typo on define of AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO55_DEVSLP0 To: Ed W Cc: Hans de Goede , Mark Gross , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Florian Eckert , "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Platform Driver , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:33 PM Ed W wrote: > > Hi > > Could I get a final opinion (or signoff) on this patch please? > > The significant typo is the reference to "59", when the GPIO is actually 55 > > According to the PCEngines schematic the names of two similar GPIOs are > G59/DEVSLP1 > G55/DEVSLP > > The original developer named the second GPIO with a trailing 0, which doesn't seem unreasonable, > hence I just corrected the name to: > AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO55_DEVSLP0 > However another acceptable name could be: > AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO55_DEVSLP > > If I could ask for some guidance and if necessary I will resubmit this patch? Enrico, do you have an > opinion? > > However, perhaps it's already acceptable as is? It's being accepted, and will be sent later to Linus. > > Kind regards > > Ed W > > > On 21/09/2020 09:40, Ed W wrote: > > On 21/09/2020 08:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 11:33 PM Ed Wildgoose wrote: > >>> Schematics show that the GPIO number is 55 (not 59). Trivial typo. > >> Does it still DEVSLP0? Perhaps you need to drop that part as well. > >> > >> ... > > > > > > In the PCEngines schematic it's labelled as "G55/DEVSLP" (no 0) > > > > (In contrast G59 is labelled "G59/DEVSLP1") > > > > What is the quorum opinion on name? > > > > Thanks > > > > Ed W > > > > > >> > >>> #define APU2_GPIO_REG_LED3 AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO59_DEVSLP1 > >>> #define APU2_GPIO_REG_MODESW AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO32_GE1 > >>> #define APU2_GPIO_REG_SIMSWAP AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO33_GE2 > >>> -#define APU2_GPIO_REG_MPCIE2 AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO59_DEVSLP0 > >>> +#define APU2_GPIO_REG_MPCIE2 AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO55_DEVSLP0 > >>> #define APU2_GPIO_REG_MPCIE3 AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO51 > >>> > >>> /* Order in which the GPIO lines are defined in the register list */ > >>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio/gpio-amd-fch.h > >>> b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio/gpio-amd-fch.h > >>> index 9e46678ed..255d51c9d 100644 > >>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio/gpio-amd-fch.h > >>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio/gpio-amd-fch.h > >>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > >>> #define AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO49 0x40 > >>> #define AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO50 0x41 > >>> #define AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO51 0x42 > >>> -#define AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO59_DEVSLP0 0x43 > >>> +#define AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO55_DEVSLP0 0x43 > >>> #define AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO57 0x44 > >>> #define AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO58 0x45 > >>> #define AMD_FCH_GPIO_REG_GPIO59_DEVSLP1 0x46 > >> > > > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko