Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161275AbWHELrU (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:47:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161284AbWHELrU (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:47:20 -0400 Received: from smtp009.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.63]:22625 "HELO smtp009.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161275AbWHELrU (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:47:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=NSvPqSAAwtF1tix+0Encn+LQ1MyDBFr28hszQh5M5Hsa88lgqizL+mgwyXEMooY8o3iQ0dQpOG4lA/yCGXivcRBZys/T4gix4kFIdSLJ9ZkOa3tUzYVjEUlgvNYSsJp+afaA+fxsaZdmsbdeCEsZx/gWqUKnQpnjHmWKzAshRE0= ; From: Blaisorblade To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, sandr8@gmail.com Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 10/19] UML - Remove spinlock wrapper functions Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 13:47:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: "Jeff Dike" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200607070033.k670XhQR008707@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <517e86fb0608040600n52f36b8ci60f4e219f8cd4b5a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <517e86fb0608040600n52f36b8ci60f4e219f8cd4b5a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608051347.26926.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1055 Lines: 26 On Friday 04 August 2006 15:00, alessandro salvatori wrote: > Jeff, > > the new lock irq_lock is still static, but we now have preprocessor > macros to be included from a header file Are you talking about spin_lock_irqsave & co? In that case you have maybe missed that the removed functions were simply wrappers for spin_lock_irqsave. Those wrappers existed to be used in files which can't include kernel headers (long story). > instead of non-static functions in > the same module as the static irq_lock. > Am I missing something? -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/