Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161305AbWHEL5p (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:57:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161306AbWHEL5p (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:57:45 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:32438 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161305AbWHEL5p (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 07:57:45 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: A proposal - binary Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 13:57:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Zachary Amsden , Chris Wright , Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Rusty Russell , Jack Lo , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, pazke@donpac.ru References: <44D1CC7D.4010600@vmware.com> <200608050001.52535.ak@suse.de> <20060805104735.GS25692@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20060805104735.GS25692@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608051357.09432.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 628 Lines: 18 > Has anyone measured the performance impact of rutime CLOCK_TICK_RATE > switching (since this will no longer allow some compile time > optimizations in jiffies.h)? SUSE shipped a kernel briefly that had runtime switchable jiffies and there were some benchmarks done and they didn't show noticeable slowdown. But with hr timers it should be pretty much obsolete anyways. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/