Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751341AbWHFJ4q (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Aug 2006 05:56:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751372AbWHFJ4p (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Aug 2006 05:56:45 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:25648 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751341AbWHFJ4p (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Aug 2006 05:56:45 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uAGBeLdGndI6rbRclbaj5vEkQh+5+2f5NWba31fuHkgryFT0V9q5vKujyjMZ8v67XcD3uJTD1fnh1Z3hUEIuMB5YOOnYaqcFK7dELK9BQwtF0aCV+ZxOYYH9RpuzQCELLp9LcXoO7tl95xH9o3fMcYrZPOldgOtX6JKfBBHn+70= Message-ID: <41840b750608060256g1a7bb9c3s843d3ac08e512d63@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:56:43 +0300 From: "Shem Multinymous" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] thinkpad_ec: New driver for ThinkPad embedded controller access Cc: rlove@rlove.org, khali@linux-fr.org, gregkh@suse.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hdaps-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20060806005613.01c5a56a.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <11548492171301-git-send-email-multinymous@gmail.com> <11548492242899-git-send-email-multinymous@gmail.com> <20060806005613.01c5a56a.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2078 Lines: 49 Hi, On 8/6/06, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:26:46 +0300 > Shem Multinymous wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Shem Multinymous > > This rather defeats the purpose of the DCO. SubmittingPatches declares the purpose of the DCO as "To improve tracking of who did what, especially with patches that can percolate to their final resting place in the kernel through several layers of maintainers." I indeed certify that: (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file; or (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have the right under that license to submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in the file; or (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it. (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution are public and that a record of the contribution (including all personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with this project or the open source license(s) involved. Practically speaking, this contact address is stable and reliable. What more is needed that may be realistically expected from a kernel patch submission? Shem - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/