Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: Use KVM_BUG/KVM_BUG_ON to handle bugs
 that are fatal to the VM
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@lemote.com>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
        kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20200923224530.17735-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
 <20200923224530.17735-4-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
 <878scze4l5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20200924181134.GB9649@linux.intel.com>
 <87k0wichht.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
 <20200925171233.GC31528@linux.intel.com>
 <731dd323-8c66-77ff-cf15-4bbdea34bcf9@redhat.com>
 <20200929035257.GH31514@linux.intel.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <c195f6b4-c714-16e3-879f-0196540e1987@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:15:19 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200929035257.GH31514@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 29/09/20 05:52, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> I think usage should be limited to dangerous cases, basically WARN_ON
>> level.  However I agree with Vitaly that KVM_GET_* should be allowed.
>
> On the topic of feedback from Vitaly, while dredging through my mailbox I
> rediscovered his suggestion of kvm->kvm_internal_bug (or maybe just
> kvm->internal_bug) instead of kvm->vm_bugged[*].

Also agrees with KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR.

>> The other question is whether to return -EIO or KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR.
>>  The latter is more likely to be handled already by userspace.
>
> And probably less confusing for unsuspecting users.  E.g. -EIO is most
> likely to be interpreted as "I screwed up", whereas KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR
> will correctly be read as "KVM screwed up".

All good points, seems like you have enough review material for the
non-RFC version.

Paolo