Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751121AbWHGHTg (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 03:19:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751122AbWHGHTg (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 03:19:36 -0400 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.233.200]:42807 "EHLO relay.sw.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751121AbWHGHTf (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 03:19:35 -0400 Message-ID: <44D6E98C.9090208@sw.ru> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:19:40 +0400 From: Kirill Korotaev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rohitseth@google.com CC: vatsa@in.ibm.com, Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, sam@vilain.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvz.org, efault@gmx.de, balbir@in.ibm.com, sekharan@us.ibm.com, nagar@watson.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, pj@sgi.com Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller References: <20060804050753.GD27194@in.ibm.com> <20060803223650.423f2e6a.akpm@osdl.org> <20060803224253.49068b98.akpm@osdl.org> <1154684950.23655.178.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060804114109.GA28988@in.ibm.com> <44D35F0B.5000801@sw.ru> <20060804153123.GB32412@in.ibm.com> <44D36FB5.3050002@sw.ru> <1154716024.7228.32.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <1154716024.7228.32.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 841 Lines: 22 >>>Doesnt the ability to move tasks between groups dynamically affect >>>(atleast) memory controller design (in giving up ownership etc)? >> >>we save object owner on the object. So if you change the container, >>objects are still correctly charged to the creator and are uncharged >>correctly on free. >> > > > Seems like the object owner should also change when the object moves > from one container to another. Consider a file which is opened in 2 processes. one of the processes wants to move to another container then. How would you decide whether to change the file owner or not? Kirill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/