Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:49:24 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, John Wood <john.wood@gmx.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] security/fbfam: Use the api to manage
 statistics
Message-ID: <20200929194924.31640617@oasis.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20200929194712.541c860c@oasis.local.home>
References: <20200910202107.3799376-1-keescook@chromium.org>
        <20200910202107.3799376-4-keescook@chromium.org>
        <202009101625.0E3B6242@keescook>
        <20200929194712.541c860c@oasis.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:47:12 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:33:38 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
> > > @@ -1940,6 +1941,7 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
> > >  	task_numa_free(current, false);
> > >  	if (displaced)
> > >  		put_files_struct(displaced);
> > > +	fbfam_execve();    
> > 
> > As mentioned in the other emails, I think this could trivially be
> > converted into an LSM: all the hooks are available AFAICT. If you only
> > want to introspect execve _happening_, you can use bprm_creds_for_exec
> > which is called a few lines above. Otherwise, my prior suggestion ("the
> > exec has happened" hook via brpm_cred_committing, etc).  
> 
> And if its information only, you could just register a callback to the
> trace_sched_process_exec() tracepoint and do whatever you want then.
> 
> The tracepoints are available for anyone to attach to. Not just tracing.
> 

And there's also trace_sched_process_fork() and
trace_sched_process_exit().

-- Steve