Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 05:13:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 05:13:33 -0500 Received: from [195.66.192.167] ([195.66.192.167]:47116 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 05:13:28 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: vda To: "Robert Love ; J Sloan" Subject: Re: [BUG] Smbfs + preempt on 2.4.10 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:10:38 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: <01102919120800.05333@nemo> <3BDDA646.B5D0E526@lexus.com> <1004388815.805.11.camel@phantasy> In-Reply-To: <1004388815.805.11.camel@phantasy> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01103112103801.00794@nemo> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > I narrowed down Samba weirdness I observe on 2.4.10 to preempt patch. > > > Plain 2.4.10 works fine, 2.4.10+preempt (with latency measurement > > > turned on) is sometimes oopses, and sometimes reports 'file already > > > exists' when I attempt to copy a file from WinNT box to Linux. > > > Sometimes it works ok (50% or so...) > > > > Why not try a recent kernel + preempt? > > Yes, would you mind retesting on a recent kernel and a recent patch? 2.4.13+preempt exhibits the same bug (latency measurement patch not applied). I am still very willing to help in stomping on this bug. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/