Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp4316915pxk; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:48:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymzhZ0SHWZvve7lrr8mnhKmUjxfyg72zqpTB1NKw71GpRAgbVMbUFwdAZIaQpQe3rYnc9r X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7e4e:: with SMTP id z14mr906486ejr.477.1601444890899; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:48:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601444890; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=K5jmgIZmDSpuPk30miif6nyurotYyfHKp5CWp8CR/XEJh5dLboAXwHjkXYrsfYtbHL cAc1meRLpOo8JOE4x6Z9clNrVgWQx/IQ5qOIcaonmY7CwMjPUuc0hqmu+3EGnLf3WCdm /kxfZBMhoNye1hJ4JXi5A9sn5IEBkNdCQGIb3WGLERspwW88t+FEURmIY3BcG2hUx8ZJ xSKnqSSBYrOk4UI37OThpjZ+1MUksLTElVzk+NVXSOeD9g5FQf1uU8QhWkGrxI0ZbcEA KxIfYGISTgYf/MJXgxhA7qcOcuwjXX7q+FxpXutujzPOw8Rn0bhfiLb3YzxUL7Lizj9U OJCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=YTntM7CoJaV8IezMsAd4LGcSeXceEkxjfopvkjTdjsU=; b=sR/d+S6yuY9Da/2CBs8TMyEptLR5OKnW1TkO6/H6XE1bljGXivsxm0FCfGNj0JZhQF qbMInXgO1qBXm1V9I7YMvKEdGs70/Umih3/yt+tssF05or2pbg11I3SnsiiHsdjq4Xdd 32JpgRM9qvldByvu5aBgLSZdeg5GhHsuCh5nlxhFOzmsZO2xKQIQhYOOuPv1AprSk6cC UBDEXlGEXVXIqk5VVcYkBR4K1rgxj5LjjYWMWrAogK/vSktaxbWgDLLQRXhkTJ9S3UBa /XbqSsAPsKdSAWRFVVVOOdKTY41MtUfAHIzfknElldK2APfAorAg7ytJsBq5xGRomOi5 ThDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nEbhdnxy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c8si407675edn.87.2020.09.29.22.47.46; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nEbhdnxy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725879AbgI3Fqw (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:46:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37204 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725306AbgI3Fqv (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 01:46:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com (mail-pg1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27FC9C061755; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id t14so383695pgl.10; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:46:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=YTntM7CoJaV8IezMsAd4LGcSeXceEkxjfopvkjTdjsU=; b=nEbhdnxyzhDE0kOHHmSlYHi0f4zsO7yr9B4e+Yozh7cqTvGvD9a0EZhp7Ir1N/chk4 NjKk+Am1QSFrHwhJcidg+R0DcNMCUOjirA/v14DVt9FC/dVeO73JLVTLTxGT4CLvZ1dT RG5SrWDhkCvTQ/7NwZ/+Ma9NkpCi8YNwAUXLbQZDHK5BAdM4gau1lLC/Zgfr62497o+e 8skSGjaSs5h4QPdvROAGV8twcjPzLpXz1YXDYaUm1DbgnhENGLpAPZR6HMGZGcD5Mj28 hn7jBzjMy+wnTnH+kRYbabVaW1EP9FjcE671mEiXgV3VKHGupwWVAad4PITp83QTF1mC hsKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YTntM7CoJaV8IezMsAd4LGcSeXceEkxjfopvkjTdjsU=; b=Xc7vs2D/SsDb3gi6um1xmtf/e6V4KonFAwhPyN2bVrgWMcV+oK4lXzgZopxmt/fc4O PMalhz+BMkIdKvl0JtqxlFpQjKkKTbKYMvV3P04SQ7Q9c1xOs05+LqRCiyR1J4Nw4jnw 0F3+6Zhq48nVap7BOObKdaPyZTQXmVckQtWaaxHkUJbWsrMqLhirJHO745jJu3vh2Ca5 BFMUrBHgpJw1znztCvOK6PJMfhjAGDNDpcEKJXV3+0xTDh9+N7pLYlV6qd1jKjDUeOe6 hyHwZhOWuWRwOiexw4uR6Y/gosJc18zFViKLWQMhBvPsBMAC7Hi0xD4dKiBPrGVvaVvi asCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533IXy8dwTpdEksS9gymbz+OrGpi5VRXejLCvNz1keQWWHD4yKQK dkQACEmMkoZMvtfn5gsHhSs= X-Received: by 2002:a63:ce47:: with SMTP id r7mr888011pgi.360.1601444810709; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Asurada-Nvidia (thunderhill.nvidia.com. [216.228.112.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v13sm728237pjr.12.2020.09.29.22.46.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:41:20 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: Dmitry Osipenko Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, joro@8bytes.org, krzk@kernel.org, vdumpa@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework .probe_device and .attach_dev Message-ID: <20200930054119.GE31821@Asurada-Nvidia> References: <20200930003013.31289-1-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <20200930003013.31289-3-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:39:54AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 30.09.2020 03:30, Nicolin Chen пишет: > > static int tegra_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, > > struct device *dev) > > { > > + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); > > struct tegra_smmu *smmu = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > > struct tegra_smmu_as *as = to_smmu_as(domain); > > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > > - struct of_phandle_args args; > > unsigned int index = 0; > > int err = 0; > > > > - while (!of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "iommus", "#iommu-cells", index, > > - &args)) { > > - unsigned int swgroup = args.args[0]; > > - > > - if (args.np != smmu->dev->of_node) { > > - of_node_put(args.np); > > - continue; > > - } > > - > > - of_node_put(args.np); > > + if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &tegra_smmu_ops) > > + return -ENOENT; > > s/&tegra_smmu_ops/smmu->iommu.ops/ > > Secondly, is it even possible that fwspec could be NULL here or that > fwspec->ops != smmu->ops? I am following what's in the arm-smmu driver, as I think it'd be a common practice to do such a check in such a way.