Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp4331080pxk; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:21:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJys26bKJfE5LDkpJeUsd+OFU/d5fiP4iPoOODW4GUWXj3lBfbjgp5zBQGgzZm26KIxI3Ici X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3c01:: with SMTP id h1mr1310385ejg.111.1601446891946; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:21:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601446891; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ruN3TlgdajVBwlk6X2MGpefgrVcAxy1Tiz9/ZRysGRPFq77cYOOlfI84HJ1pNCEkTw joS9Yt8E2ODuzZcFftmIjNc9RIeeKnGhEjax4h6shMXECeij19YXIxk5ZyH96D3ICaWh hp5cj0fGE8fvSIq+rcrB1Q9kjvqqaQIki0PmhsHfiiC282QU6L8JwiKHNHoqr5lm92lm 2MoGFowFSdKDsnluMCss/FOh33CT2uF8xjp6GhbSj0l+SZbqj123LO7+MqBwZEVEVcBl UDZS8lOzK+ZieR6LNS6/tRAXE5KgluMioAfzvgwCr9h95eUmE79bApP48j4FjrT1I5ho BM7Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=HGwliGdnOsvbFNk+ILVrrA6wWvnB3mx6++Vzoqu61bk=; b=mXbTNrHp/3gZuXI5a9AfcRl9YscuaR+Og/dIz6Dhld8oplLmFSmrVQ3nPHexDzDYMQ CGAaJ9l7+ziM8+Ig3EXPyeJIeObPqXWV8WASQR1sbAECnuYQNqneh+y5C2SZTT6KUOOE R37boxmw03bjN+73JAFKj3/+YgKGSPSm67wxdayjI6wOQxcwB+6QK8awMC04OG7c0Rzw oFgsdioK7TfU17ctv4Lrhdoyt+FrTgPoP7LwXUPUP+bBnJ3pgaVSrp/jY5Xhr65JwMsK 0IrxozhIOVL7DUHNpqZWGtARJE3hHFUxXywIEn3gpBMaiOhdRMnTjc4fXDH/3ji4rsWu c4kg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=m+rSaFzK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id yd16si559343ejb.689.2020.09.29.23.21.08; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=m+rSaFzK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728041AbgI3GTZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 02:19:25 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725779AbgI3GTZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 02:19:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x642.google.com (mail-pl1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::642]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D55FC061755; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x642.google.com with SMTP id t18so377239plo.1; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:19:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=HGwliGdnOsvbFNk+ILVrrA6wWvnB3mx6++Vzoqu61bk=; b=m+rSaFzK3MX0An+UuLThLPSMN2e3pp1A3HkBG1Xi/+3l41Ax48PGeRUpvIjIgMZfbc j9iNHBqumdJngqmUpcron/qJZstDOh5dg9PQR0+eZK3hris7o7mIYSd6VRce+gTkHWi2 o9GYsDLYH1+IYLb7aihaxZD5nDAWR288tiW0YYwJW/lktXvQAEhgSo+evVkWbtYo0a6A 2n6gSqgHNg8y8iszxoRVTAdTEK71669BPnqUcjqYQFXPTptfSGZZRq+IkNm2eW3P669a O8qaXsbUMdoQXha229tmCWBGsPbeRfJvDPXIvdvAZUgo5SZVrMJZfmVs4+3fISDwz0Q9 1lAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HGwliGdnOsvbFNk+ILVrrA6wWvnB3mx6++Vzoqu61bk=; b=n5rbz8jiGQFKNNa6Lf5jhosIk/p4IAZ+qfPa53597mqVBlLl3B1a/WuPS/G+v3ZpoR MzIvwrZv5/4lZNEbKhGS5O6nvc1iyzxZYFuJcPiT82ZzZH9p8/GjhUeG7AodBAiz9XyV a4FSiupQFVBqE0IlHko6U2UD4qs+Urj2MGC9ZE3mU9kUt+ut0ajbaJArkcBj7beqxZ0Y rMpNSLZ1pVMZ3d/qnmGKXp1ACGst6sxRoRvPssGx0UxgxOvSVyLsIpZIc8h60R4Tv9p8 E40rBQYDbwBpQgCUHVkNcK6ktbZKUStWkGqNJcro+RCCEkbIV+CymmRsNITHxQJ/1g2m jHKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Dv03iumTfE/fu+uyz6MkcNiQjMxqffSn4kokyCabR3dtodNpD f49xkvW1mddhATxZ29GCp8k= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9d82:: with SMTP id k2mr1165283pjp.197.1601446765072; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Asurada-Nvidia (thunderhill.nvidia.com. [216.228.112.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n9sm822737pgi.2.2020.09.29.23.19.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 23:13:52 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: Dmitry Osipenko Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, joro@8bytes.org, krzk@kernel.org, vdumpa@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework .probe_device and .attach_dev Message-ID: <20200930061351.GA16460@Asurada-Nvidia> References: <20200930003013.31289-1-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <20200930003013.31289-3-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <75514da5-e63a-9e51-8376-abbd12c324d1@gmail.com> <20200930054900.GG31821@Asurada-Nvidia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:10:38AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 30.09.2020 08:49, Nicolin Chen пишет: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:11:52AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > >> 30.09.2020 03:30, Nicolin Chen пишет: > >>> + /* An invalid mc pointer means mc and smmu drivers are not ready */ > >>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mc)) > >> > >> tegra_get_memory_controller() doesn't return NULL. > > > > Well, I don't want to assume that it'd do that forever, and the > > NULL check of IS_ERR_OR_NULL is marked "unlikely" so it doesn't > > hurt to have. > > > > I don't see any reasons why it won't do that forever. > > Secondly, public function can't be changed randomly without updating all > the callers. > > Hence there is no need to handle cases that can't ever happen and it > hurts readability of the code + original error code is missed. I don't quite understand why an extra "_OR_NULL" would hurt readability....but I'd take a step back and use IS_ERR().