Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932153AbWHGPdU (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:33:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932162AbWHGPdT (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:33:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:928 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932153AbWHGPdT (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:33:19 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Make NR_IRQS configurable in Kconfig Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 17:33:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Andrew Morton , "Protasevich, Natalie" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608071733.13562.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1002 Lines: 25 On Monday 07 August 2006 17:26, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Currrently on a SMP system we can theoretically support > NR_CPUS*224 irqs. Unfortunately our data structures > don't cope will with that many irqs, nor does hardware > typically provide that many irq sources. > > With the number of cores starting to follow Moores > law, and the apicid limits being raised beyond an 8bit > number trying to track our current maximum with our > current data structures would be fatal and wasteful. > > So this patch decouples the number of irqs we support > from the number of cpus. We can revisit this decision > once someone reworks the current data structures. Ok. I was about to apply it, but it seems to require mm patches right now, so i didn't -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/