Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932195AbWHGQL1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:11:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932201AbWHGQL1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:11:27 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:20813 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932198AbWHGQLZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:11:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mV1wX1fn6h96hjws0SSxy/V5adkcEeRAbmpgyCcQLqeGqNhWOTOEGKkRZ9WQEZrtG+YHaRblwhtgcV8EESgChQ3gIMvnRJpFvuddJsvhkZbOWXm1wb3+YVhZHYVFCqXfzacKYCp4/FkSIQ734iuP4SjyEqf19ToMLSwtj7nlwWI= Message-ID: <292693080608070911g57ae1215qd994e03b9dd87b66@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:41:23 +0530 From: "Daniel Rodrick" To: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Univeral Protocol Driver (using UNDI) in Linux Cc: "Linux Newbie" , kernelnewbies , linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <44D7579D.1040303@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <292693080608070339p6b42feacw9d8f27a147cf1771@mail.gmail.com> <44D7579D.1040303@zytor.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2005 Lines: 51 On 8/7/06, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Daniel Rodrick wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > I was curious as to why a Universal driver (using UNDI API) for Linux > > does not exist (or does it)? > > > > I want to try and write a such a driver that could (in principle) > > handle all the NICs that are PXE compatible. > > > > Has this been tried? What are the technical problems that might come in > > my way? > > > > It has been tried; in fact Intel did implement this in their "Linux PXE > SDK". The UNDI API is absolutely atrocious, however, being based on > NDIS2 which is widely considered the worst of all the many network > stacks for DOS. > > Additionally, many UNDI stacks don't work correctly when called from > protected mode, since the interface doesn't work right. Additionally, > UNDI is *ONLY* available after booting from the NIC. > Agreed. But still having a single driver for all the NICs would be simply GREAT for my setup, in which all the PCs will be booted using PXE only. So apart from performance / relilability issues, what are the technical roadblocks in this? I'm sure having a single driver for all the NICs is a feature cool enough to die for. Yes, it might have drawbacks like just pointed out by Peter, but surely a "single driver for all NIC" feature could prove to be great in some systems. But since it does not already exist in the kernel, there must be some technical feasibility isse. Any ideas on this? And any Idea where can I find the Intel's PXE SDK for Linux? I googled for an hour but to no avail. Texts suggest that it was available on Intel Architecture's Lab website which is non existent now. I would appreciate if some one could send me the PXE SDk from Intel, if somebody still has a copy. Thanks, Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/