Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp4653586pxk; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:22:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMpjIgvW6kIO04SNGU/hoZUFHdHZtNaQrQMk0Z4uk6P+fsXLRXIMpUgszMIf9Ji3XAJkUD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:17ed:: with SMTP id t13mr3395110edy.163.1601479356949; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:22:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601479356; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XtdDm5deaw4kGixnem4YrLKhHlJDQgt61S6BXZXtO9RpFi+a+mZeMn3A6DOFt5EZXx F21eylUI0f63aSsdb8ngjh38BvSnjYVXaSMsw8wQ0a83LBD/eE5LyvX7j4Keer7lDH8A GGinEHARubxNv0c+VeZ6oqZcgSqCowRJelO0neaLTjphiU9qfLFzu0CCEpo965leOmfQ TRahP96cxaTsZz9GbKZCleeSQKe9DWpCu1o40WD2ux6tlCQwvcLIvEzBX/ac6hAHUmch OW+GLpuy6G3AEgPPJyn9VG+iC+2RtZ3Xnr5PxIxxZnzmJlrKDjE6ZSU/o+bgG2fZqCU9 PkIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=8oFwCHrN/W6WTNQvqTZiyA5hlMY4vck+KbQYcROkbgY=; b=0Czu4ufQnuaM24lk/607m2EhTN1sZZ65ZKo0qM3+QHjtQCw9C2QatogfcygISFdY1x rvUZO3NzO+wzLl83G2yde6fui0Z3vU3L4YicrM/Chsmd1QQ1YmeZUJchOhxJXHICo06j a9gRCEonVjqcgOruxjG9ck13PGGb80/36LfsGLHcxr4/JWg5Gt4BACTXWxOfDtJrrK5g JqzkFR1yfklyDRY9wOrfSTRdUaXxRaOUuadrdQH6RytuxfMrgKK3BxHYloiAL9nS6LDF bcFCn6GMC2Y9cUv7IfwJscOme7dNav5NgFJa7MaM62zPwJHIRK6jk+JFMZ7RayMjRp2P fWEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="tYCl/2l9"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a7si1248023edy.401.2020.09.30.08.22.12; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b="tYCl/2l9"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730813AbgI3PVD (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:21:03 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:57490 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725892AbgI3PUy (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:20:54 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1601479252; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8oFwCHrN/W6WTNQvqTZiyA5hlMY4vck+KbQYcROkbgY=; b=tYCl/2l9R4E995Qh3NpKoAyGCVWL3mDAoINqMv/wNuGX6S4HLY1wMVi/opGNyehAjnBuMJ J/mFnxqGJi9y1lrDtU8LnMFno2uyNWDnp52TihMLBsugausO/YZBw9cbDzave2vbIBXeT8 c9XBrJIFqei726uvASaVWHUY0kaV6FfyTCQHpLR8sEmrbwtoP4kxIIsZD7IACBeeRFwZRn 7ON7hpLw5Uvl1DVWD6PmixAFdMiv1ob39g6MMUQOdgyjsZ5EuJng24RutTqLc8w0qmwBjO sK7GXvZRJiyMy6q4MjQkl7MaHjpAFd5Jhp3xPljWJGbGpYvLtX3WFJdeM0y38A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1601479252; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8oFwCHrN/W6WTNQvqTZiyA5hlMY4vck+KbQYcROkbgY=; b=rv9d/q3MBb3+XU/aNA8ggIe1jaJhGhyVmeVzqZNtV+VXBu3CX7H3vdb/c69eCm+ZLdQNzU yUPJ6t5/jmsl7jBg== To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: "Dey\, Megha" , LKML , x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Haiyang Zhang , Jon Derrick , Lu Baolu , Wei Liu , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Stephen Hemminger , Steve Wahl , Dimitri Sivanich , Russ Anderson , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , Stefano Stabellini , Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dave Jiang , Alex Williamson , Jacob Pan , Baolu Lu , Kevin Tian , Dan Williams , ravi.v.shankar@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/46] x86, PCI, XEN, genirq ...: Prepare for device MSI In-Reply-To: <20200930114301.GD816047@nvidia.com> References: <20200826111628.794979401@linutronix.de> <10b5d933-f104-7699-341a-0afb16640d54@intel.com> <87v9fvix5f.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20200930114301.GD816047@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:20:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87k0wbi94b.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 30 2020 at 08:43, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:41:48AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 29 2020 at 16:03, Megha Dey wrote: >> > On 8/26/2020 4:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> #9 is obviously just for the folks interested in IMS >> >> >> > >> > I see that the tip tree (as of 9/29) has most of these patches but >> > notice that the DEV_MSI related patches >> > >> > haven't made it. I have tested the tip tree(x86/irq branch) with your >> > DEV_MSI infra patches and our IMS patches with the IDXD driver and was >> >> Your IMS patches? Why do you need something special again? >> >> > wondering if we should push out those patches as part of our patchset? >> >> As I don't have any hardware to test that, I was waiting for you and >> Jason to confirm that this actually works for the two different IMS >> implementations. > > How urgently do you need this? The code looked good from what I > understood. It will be a while before we have all the parts to send an > actual patch though. I personally do not need it at all :) Megha might have different thoughts... > We might be able to put together a mockup just to prove it If that makes Megha's stuff going that would of course be appreciated, but we can defer the IMS_QUEUE part for later. It's orthogonal to the IMS_ARRAY stuff. Thanks, tglx