Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] soc: ti: k3-socinfo: Add entry for AM64 SoC family
To:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>, <nm@ti.com>,
        <t-kristo@ti.com>, <ssantosh@kernel.org>, <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
        "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        "Anna, Suman" <s-anna@ti.com>
References: <20200928083429.17390-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
 <20200928083429.17390-12-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
 <aa10c7a1-ddbd-a3ae-3035-f26a5ce073ae@ti.com>
From:   Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Message-ID: <c2dcf5a3-abff-923c-7610-a670f02479e6@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:42:11 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <aa10c7a1-ddbd-a3ae-3035-f26a5ce073ae@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi Grygorii,

On 30/09/2020 16.56, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>=20
>=20
> On 28/09/2020 11:34, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> It's JTAG PARTNO is 0xBB38.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>> ---
>> =C2=A0 drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c | 1 +
>> =C2=A0 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c=

>> index bbbc2d2b7091..a14ec68846dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static const struct k3_soc_id {
>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 { 0xBB5A, "AM65X" },
>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 { 0xBB64, "J721E" },
>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 { 0xBB6D, "J7200" },
>> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 { 0xBB38, "AM64" }
>=20
> Shouldn't it be AM64X

Good point, I'll fix this up and then the DMA series.

While here, what do you think: should we keep the DMA compatibles as I
have them in v1 (am64-dmss-bcdma and am64-dmss-pktdma):
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-10-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com=
/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-11-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com=
/

or change them to am64x-dmss-* ?

I'll ask Rob on the binding doc patches as well.

>=20
>> =C2=A0 };
>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 static int
>>
>=20

- P=C3=A9ter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki