Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp216955pxk; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 00:05:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlyVvw1XIqUu3r1Wty/5RcJ9qpdMKfRRhMRqlTMjIcCeLL8qhpZXa63cTAcdT+I/b4HICp X-Received: by 2002:a50:9fa5:: with SMTP id c34mr6542708edf.2.1601535935798; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:05:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601535935; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UuYIk9TYmK7wWg8QzAJH7576dOvVrTxgZ+wKjk9C0TRnvp0gk8kXaqw7skiggospsD EnccHbo0lMTqFJQ3ShxYUEtxV65dj8J0SBKqgVNP2c6l0vWtpVMHEpteRHDZ5m5oj3iE 4iwewkh0ad1uwfDR4PL+1ZRdg47+BLn8eMf8wS3hu5XFaWM+T4jpZQ5tuFImA9GAKC+r pSOuLvdhI0rYRpNQvESLGlr4MPn6lOWhbJmwzpTrupj1x3At5xyLHLGKJdOeDJ4XHjzZ XjG3m9GXyMx3LMjuAUHIpnRUgaLlKk6YL/x89B+eL6+dtR1u5+BQ8SDat6sC9svhSDI1 Akog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :from:references:cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=jr++drygVOB/FYfynCT7Sv8bL4OVBmwKAgld1xwEjkY=; b=ZSCLh5BZ/Tr2yGWsjDFFDvRNVp40zjyoqtEck/vdgSyWXNJh7g7dvBn8eXMluTpSsl TXRgCX6OErTqCfFcwfhmH59xPmuhdxp70d7PXtm8z2bOyiHM/BC3kr1JUccsiw8PhWaE 2cIJFYhkr5/OWOBINhGSGF7sk4HFMrP8ZbbV85jRUf6GCabmOthBclPQmaxvgoK4+whj OL0PdmpfnzoMCdLu7WL/N49TBPJOebtPEXh2lqMMaFqO9VN1Fs6h/itZNbVCCd8y1vVi 44FCiWI6j0xximLVTRGMsYTGZyorGyFxYZPT7+RNBFhbhlgGHWhUHJ500rhIEFK7V+Bo Up9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u23si2844970eja.295.2020.10.01.00.05.04; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731248AbgJAHDc (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 03:03:32 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:4236 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730785AbgJAHDb (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 03:03:31 -0400 IronPort-SDR: m9uhc6p3nb7haiZMambYtucL7Cs7CopoWiarARH7fYszyG6FcfcAZs7Yka1DAJWPCOhiaeqHlx WiH1JK1LlQxg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9760"; a="150432178" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,323,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="150432178" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Oct 2020 00:03:28 -0700 IronPort-SDR: gwm++hiDFy9+iEO+P2oYXrYRgBmdazSUgOiEJatzVlmjyMNOKQquYlBxzWq6atxzGjtNbS00/X 1ePdxBsE7tLQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,323,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="457999882" Received: from ahunter-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.190]) ([10.237.72.190]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2020 00:03:23 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: don't set limits.discard_granularity as 0 To: Coly Li Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Vicente Bergas , Ulf Hansson , "Martin K. Petersen" References: <20200930160854.65710-1-colyli@suse.de> <5178b9e0-6b95-45ef-80f1-862de554e625@intel.com> <026e4bab-5d1d-50b9-29c4-e871fcd27b8b@suse.de> <3cc59ace-d4b5-d10b-05a0-8677c95515ff@intel.com> <2dad99ac-ae48-09a3-ed3b-c021214d7951@suse.de> From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki Message-ID: <794af2df-3bd7-43c2-e5ff-9453cba1d424@intel.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:02:50 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2dad99ac-ae48-09a3-ed3b-c021214d7951@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/10/20 9:29 am, Coly Li wrote: > On 2020/10/1 14:14, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> On 1/10/20 7:36 am, Coly Li wrote: >>> On 2020/10/1 01:23, Adrian Hunter wrote: >>>> On 30/09/20 7:08 pm, Coly Li wrote: >>>>> In mmc_queue_setup_discard() the mmc driver queue's discard_granularity >>>>> might be set as 0 (when card->pref_erase > max_discard) while the mmc >>>>> device still declares to support discard operation. This is buggy and >>>>> triggered the following kernel warning message, >>>>> >>>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 135 at __blkdev_issue_discard+0x200/0x294 >>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 135 Comm: f2fs_discard-17 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6 #1 >>>>> Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT) >>>>> pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) >>>>> pc : __blkdev_issue_discard+0x200/0x294 >>>>> lr : __blkdev_issue_discard+0x54/0x294 >>>>> sp : ffff800011dd3b10 >>>>> x29: ffff800011dd3b10 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800011dd3cc4 x26: ffff800011dd3e18 x25: 000000000004e69b x24: 0000000000000c40 x23: ffff0000f1deaaf0 x22: ffff0000f2849200 x21: 00000000002734d8 x20: 0000000000000008 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000394 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 00000000000008b0 x9 : ffff800011dd3cb0 x8 : 000000000004e69b x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000f1926400 x5 : ffff0000f1940800 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000c40 x2 : 0000000000000008 x1 : 00000000002734d8 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: >>>>> __blkdev_issue_discard+0x200/0x294 >>>>> __submit_discard_cmd+0x128/0x374 >>>>> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly+0x188/0x244 >>>>> __issue_discard_cmd+0x2e8/0x33c >>>>> issue_discard_thread+0xe8/0x2f0 >>>>> kthread+0x11c/0x120 >>>>> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c >>>>> ---[ end trace e4c8023d33dfe77a ]--- >>>>> >>>>> This patch fixes the issue by setting discard_granularity as SECTOR_SIZE >>>>> instead of 0 when (card->pref_erase > max_discard) is true. Now no more >>>>> complain from __blkdev_issue_discard() for the improper value of discard >>>>> granularity. >>>>> >>>>> Fixes: commit e056a1b5b67b ("mmc: queue: let host controllers specify maximum discard timeout") >>>> >>>> That "Fixes" tag is a bit misleading. For some time, the block layer had >>>> no problem with discard_granularity of zero, and blk_bio_discard_split() >>>> still doesn't (see below). >>>> >>>> static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q, >>>> struct bio *bio, >>>> struct bio_set *bs, >>>> unsigned *nsegs) >>>> { >>>> unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity; >>>> int alignment; >>>> sector_t tmp; >>>> unsigned split_sectors; >>>> >>>> *nsegs = 1; >>>> >>>> /* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same. */ >>>> granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U); >>>> >>> >>> >From Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.rst, the discard_granularity is >>> described as, >>> >>> discard_granularity (RO) >>> ------------------------ >>> This shows the size of internal allocation of the device in bytes, if >>> reported by the device. A value of '0' means device does not support >>> the discard functionality. >>> >>> >>> And from Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block, the discard_granularity >>> is described as, >>> >>> What: /sys/block//queue/discard_granularity >>> Date: May 2011 >>> Contact: Martin K. Petersen >>> Description: >>> Devices that support discard functionality may >>> internally allocate space using units that are bigger >>> than the logical block size. The discard_granularity >>> parameter indicates the size of the internal allocation >>> unit in bytes if reported by the device. Otherwise the >>> discard_granularity will be set to match the device's >>> physical block size. A discard_granularity of 0 means >>> that the device does not support discard functionality. >>> >>> >>> Therefore I took it as a bug when a driver sets its queue >>> discard_granularity as 0 but still announces to support discard operation. >>> >>> But if you don't like the Fixes: tag, it is OK for me to remove it in >>> next version. >> >> Not at all. I just wrote "a bit misleading" because people might also want >> to know from what patch things stopped working. > > Oh maybe I understand you. Yes, although this fixed patch was bug, but > the warning was triggered since the new discard alignment changes got > merged. > > Hmm, maybe I should add the Fixes tag to commit b35fd7422c2f ("block: > check queue's limits.discard_granularity in __blkdev_issue_discard()"). > > How do you think of this commit id ? Yes that could be mentioned in the commit message or Fixes or both. With that: Acked-by: Adrian Hunter