Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:03:54 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
        rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
        oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
        mgorman@techsingularity.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] drm/i915: Cleanup PREEMPT_COUNT
 leftovers
Message-ID: <20201001160354.GC29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <20200928233041.GA23230@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
 <20200928233102.24265-11-paulmck@kernel.org>
 <160153665673.4398.6268028176406103680@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <871riigxp9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871riigxp9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:25:06AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 10:17, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Quoting paulmck@kernel.org (2020-09-29 02:30:58)
> >> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is now unconditionally enabled and will be
> >> removed. Cleanup the leftovers before doing so.
> >
> > Change looks fine:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Applied, thank you!

> > Are you looking for us to merge or merge through another tree?
> >
> > If us, did the base patch always enabling PREEMPT_COUNT go into 5.9 or is
> > it heading to 5.10? We can queue this earliest for 5.11 as drm-next closed
> > for 5.10 at week of -rc5.
> 
> If at all it goes through rcu/tip because it depends on the earlier patches.

I was figuring on sending a pull request later today, Pacific Time.

							Thanx, Paul