Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 07:26:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 07:26:16 -0500 Received: from [213.98.126.44] ([213.98.126.44]:11780 "HELO anano.mitica") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 07:26:05 -0500 To: Shawn Walker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: status of supermount? In-Reply-To: <200110241859.f9OIx7h27817@fs1.theiqgroup.com> X-Url: http://www.lfcia.org/~quintela From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <200110241859.f9OIx7h27817@fs1.theiqgroup.com> Date: 31 Oct 2001 13:07:45 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "shawn" == Shawn Walker writes: shawn> Does anyone know if supermount has been ported to a more recent kernel by anyone? The last version of supermount I could find was for 2.4.0 You can get patches from: ftp://ftp.mandrakesoft.com/pub/quintela/ for 2.4.8-ac12, I have patches for more recent kernel, but they are still not there. I expect to put there tomorrow of the following day. Any comments, suggestions are welcome. I am in the middle of trying ot get _some_ sane lock to supermount, as the beast basically don't have any look at the moment, normally works due to de the fact that normally there are not one hundred concurrent users of the floppy or cd :( Later, Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/