Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp942589pxk; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:43:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPDjKCQVY0AKCk6kKHW7G8SxvT3UTjOx+s4tmx58gNsV7PAjXutTf1X4MGG03DntE3Ldw1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:338c:: with SMTP id zj12mr9453611ejb.224.1601603032821; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 18:43:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601603032; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FXn7WyQf8BbRXFtKaISluav2cKx0+qug54ymV3PUdJ+8GzBwy8TBenDefYSt7VyLzn 36YMP8P/kcOK21eGnan3Zie7DhmQXXxrpvjFm+bNUItCpL5GyH7OOTcg6ylMwTIN8Ctd sdLF4icbNf7po16oyDD0nVHsPbN9nuZPwkPhWLxPbm+UJ/b3PJpSAABxRLdhsYdF1rs5 0YB2B8r86JXV2d3EUulpENTqVHNw1mgGn3TwGmU/BHIsPxBB39osrDchTQ5pQh8/20DL W7O7EcVR3CMhSJHpWRec1Kx5lKiMETFEFLDXWTEtrRqQikc+Kf71uKf/H0zC5Xr3hdfa bIxQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=9wCdjTt2ls8HQ2tgCF4UeJPED8p9gaaOHO6L/mERHSk=; b=l4CiUPS/lefRRiN97wgKJneielZPwqqlI/f1lGC7jKmwqpPCdRC7gXYOokmnBKYo2s pp9MaVZELuobMTga/C7HDyy0QFGOfuZmLSFWLUoDKuutjIpHk48x06qtWN2vRgMBFEvl AHU1egq4t4ldTsHpFU40O7wzoT1Z8PTrtQu+2Ahoq+z/jti8LTrnfJxyI/46kb1e18qn AiqUCj03S3qlYpl8+1bVxLG9q80whsCqbWTSXgMQgjJSgPoZYRbpHexiHL95MCDlaerE 2wUDGX+FOAznY6OnXwffmp8lTMAOetURmcKIYoh+kgk416FuAoWwgJUCwomrO21Fn77D NidA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o15si326459edi.64.2020.10.01.18.43.27; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 18:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387536AbgJBBkO (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 21:40:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733275AbgJBBkO (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 21:40:14 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net (shards.monkeyblade.net [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:9]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E273C0613D0; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f00:477::3d5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C8CF1285CF60; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 18:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20201001.184013.1373555560291108341.davem@davemloft.net> To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vadym.kochan@plvision.eu, ap420073@gmail.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20200929130446.0c2630d2@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20200929130446.0c2630d2@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [2620:137:e000::1:9]); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 18:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:04:46 +1000 > Caused by commit > > eff7423365a6 ("net: core: introduce struct netdev_nested_priv for nested interface infrastructure") > > interacting with commit > > e1189d9a5fbe ("net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver implementation") > > also in the net-next tree. I would argue against that "also" as the first commit is only in the 'net' tree right now. :-) This is simply something I'll have to resolve the next time net is merged into net-next. Thanks.